former federal prosecutor andy mccarthy is standing by. first, david spunt who has been covering this all along, this very quick verdict. very quick verdict. we re talking three hours and ten minutes. when you have a verdict that quick, it s not favorable to the defendant. steve bannon, the former white house adviser to former president donald trump convicted on two counts of criminal contempt of congress. willful failure to appear before testimony before january 6. guilty. count two, willful failure to provide records guilty. steve bannon s team didn t put on a defense. bannon did not testify in his own defense, which was thought that he would. the government put on a case for about a day. jury selection began just on monday, a few days ago. this was an incredibly quick trial. steve bannon s team was upset. they filed a motion. last night in front of millions in the january 6 committee hearing, the committee played this audio clip of bannon from october of 2020. listen.
And tonight Joe Biden Facedquesi with a question he wasnt expecting duringonting podcast featuring biden, clinton and obama. One of joes Hollywood Friendsasking asking him why he will not come on this show for an hour. And well, the answer gets gets interesting. Heres a little tease. Could it be as simple as just like granting an hour,g sean hannity and sit down . Go. You telldown me why the peopley who follow you think im not a good president. I the answer youll find pretty amusing. Well play bidens response. Thats coming Upfiretty Amwe Wio also tonight. Joe is plummeting in the polls. Were going to show you joetin of new numbers that have come out that are now sending the biden campaignco t, the medt mob, into a full fledged panic. Plusfullfle, a very bizarre whe house Correspondents Dinner featuring the fewest jokes. Not any good anyway in modern history with an host determined to coddle the ailing president. Determand coming up, were going to take a look at how the left is killing
President zelensky decided that they were not going to issue thatt statement that Rudy Giuliani wanted to include burisma in the 2016 elections, there was no white house meeting. It soon became clear to them that the Security Assistance was also at risk. And that took on a renewed importance for them. Well, following the 25th call, the t july 25th call, ambassador sondland and volker worked closely with mr. Giuliani and the ukrainians to help draft a statement that the president could make, president zelensky. Wasnt that right . Yes. And the report said they worked closely and there were also phone calls with the white house around the same time that they werear working closely. Do you know what that statement was supposed tou say according to mr. Giuliani and the u. S. Officials . Well, the key difference is that it had to include that ukraine would do the investigations of burisma which equalled theic Biden Investigatn in the 2016 ukraine
interference. But was there concern about doi
i should not have analogized those two things together in my haste. there s no comparison.e th there is today zero evidence zero evidence for that joe bi biden, the president of the united states, you what is some of doingatoe bof that.ra instead of following the money and holding by dzhokhar, democrats and liberal press would rather go hogwild over th charges against donald trumpth g r ne in the classified documents case. he just feel the news hanging around donald trump s neck and this is all taking place is t i chamfered and dangerous moment in this case. that probably the final nail in the coffin on this one. i mean, it reads like a spy nove l. the document reads like something ripped from the pages of the untouchablem ths. these allegations rival anything that richard nixon was accused of. this indictment reads like a mafia case. it reads like something straight out of the gambino crime family is an extraordinar document with so many parallels to a mafia investigation
t comes out. and it s not true.t s ac and it s actually a positivetu story.al positi that they got wrong.im this is important.poeverybody ou and i want everybody out there whatening to think about it because it reflects what t the bias is . the bias is so against trumpth and so against republicans. e kellyanne is right. it doesn t matter if it s ron desantis or nikki haley or whoever the nominee ends up 202 being in twenty , twenty four , do theo the same d thing and they re going to make the same errors against the republican candidate because it s about narrative it is t, as you said, sean, neg and they never make the same negligent misrepresentations when it actually benefitsre jus republicans if they were just bad at their job. f things wrongjo., they g otin both directions. it s amazing how they only get things wrong in one direction. that s why as a consumer ofsume the media,r you have to be so aggressive and so skeptical oftf everything you hear from you, for me, from kellyanne,