have not asked you about and we don t have a lot of time. you re saying why is the report biased. why do they choose to believe lindsey boylan when she threatened a witness? did they even look at what potential witness tampering, and then he changed his story? what was the threat that ms. boylan made and why didn t they include it in the report? the last point i want to make to you is that why didn t they include in the report discussions that took place between lindsey boylan s campaign and the attorney general s office shortly after tweets were made in december of 2020? there were conversations between lindsey boylan s top political consultant tripp yang and the attorney general s chief of staff ibrahim khan. they discussed ms. boylan s allegations, they discussed the campaign, there was also a press person that left no, because this point was important.
you made it yesterday during the press conference. yes, and i m going to make it again today because it s an important one and people need to understand this. that what were those discussions, what did tripp yang have to say, why was ibrahim khan talking with tripp yang who also was political consultant for letitia james, but in addition to that, her top media consultant quit after these allegations were made. was she asked what discussions she had with lindsey boylan? was the lindsey boylan campaign for their email i understand you re raising process issues, you re raising these questions, but we do want to say in a statement to cnn the