have not asked you about and we don't have a lot of time. >> you're saying why is the report biased. why do they choose to believe lindsey boylan when she threatened a witness? did they even look at what potential witness tampering, and then he changed his story? what was the threat that ms. boylan made and why didn't they include it in the report? the last point i want to make to you is that why didn't they include in the report discussions that took place between lindsey boylan's campaign and the attorney general's office shortly after tweets were made in december of 2020? there were conversations between lindsey boylan's top political consultant tripp yang and the attorney general's chief of staff ibrahim khan. they discussed ms. boylan's allegations, they discussed the campaign, there was also a press person that left -- no, because this point was important.