Rebecca evans. And anyone else that would like to comment. Good afternoon, commissioners my name is jackie sacks and i have heard this and i am familiar with thit em and i agree with the problems that you are having, is that you have got the id of the gentleman that spoke before me regarding the fixing of the transit as we have it now. As far as the proposed warriors stadium, got defeated in the last election and i read in the paip their last week, that they are trying to get the warriors stadium project back on the ballot. And because, one of the opponents of the warriors stadium, stated that the project would be higher, than washington and create more problems than the 8 washington would have done and think about that, and i am all for the transportation asset. Thank you. Thank you. Next speaker, please . Good afternoon, chair person avalos and members of the transportation authority, my name is deltori and i am with the local 261 and as you are aware, they are supported of the propo
Announcer b dreams and good grades arent enough to get into college. There are actual steps you need to take. Finding someone who can help is the first and most important. For the next steps, go to knowhow2go. Org. Welcome to the San Francisco Planning Commission regular hearing for thursday, january 23, 2014. Please be aware that the commission does not trornt any disruption of any kind please silence all electronic devices. And when speaking before the commission please do state your name for the record. President fong. Councilmember ford. Commissioner hillis. Commissioner moore and commissioner johns and commissioner antonini are expected to be absent. Item one case is for continuance in 901 is for february 26th. And the next case at 875 california street is continued until february 6th and the last case at the 1701 hate street request for stuns is for february. Item 4 for case an amendment to the planning code for formula retail use is for february 27th. Commissioner we have receiv
That they are trying to get the warriors stadium project back on the ballot. And because, one of the opponents of the warriors stadium, stated that the project would be higher, than washington and create more problems than the 8 washington would have done and think about that, and i am all for the transportation asset. Thank you. Thank you. Next speaker, please . Good afternoon, chair person avalos and members of the transportation authority, my name is deltori and i am with the local 261 and as you are aware, they are supported of the proposed warriors in the project and the job placement it will create, today i want to reach out to you so that we can Work Together to figure out how to make the transportation piecework as important as job creation is to us, we also understand the importance of transportation, and i hope that you will accept the scope of work presented today so that we can move forward and make sure that we continue to be a world class city thank you. Next speaker . My
Minutes . Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Commissioner sugaya i move to approve the minutes for january 9th. Commissioner borden. Commissioner hillis. Commissioner moore. Commissioner sugaya and Commission Chair wu so moved, commissioners, that motion passes i went at the request of some neighborhood folks in the bayview to look at the site where the mother Brown Special project for the homes structure. There are so many interesting businesses like a chemical will he testing lab it tests toxins in the food and its where tests are conducted. Another place i saw next door had mick tractors and does a lot of work around pets and par suddenly. Its favshg to see this. And their concerns are whether or not the location of the shelter, of course, is appropriate for what the needs are and the other concern is whether or not theres actually, the population of the Homeless Population in the neighborhood to continually of the shelter. There are concerns around whether or not theres social
By the former mayor who is here and i guess that i do still have a concern that we are not binding ourselves to a scope that may be too narrow and so would i like to know if there is an opportunity, to get additional feedback. I think that we should talk to people on both sides of this project. And to make sure that was whatever you think about the project and at least you are taking into consideration all of the issues that have been raised. And i have to say that i think that the objectivity, obviously should be to do it expidiciously and do it right. And this project and the scope of it is too important to not do it right. I want to be the opportunity for us to take into account expanding the scope, if people on either side of this project have additional suggestions because it is better to get the scope right now, than to change it down the road just to sure, as far as the water front assessment and i am looking at this complimentary effort that gives us extra analysis and i think