Tour Inc News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana
Stay updated with breaking news from Tour inc. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Top News In Tour Inc Today - Breaking & Trending Today
Educational after school use excel to the proposed use of vocal point and in reviewing the matter, we did find that the proposed use of vocal point does not comply with the definition of Financial Service in the planning code. It is i believe a business or professional service use. Which is not listed among the uses that is considered to be an act of commercial use. And let me back up. , the property, 239526th avenue is located at the end of 26th avenue and the unit is 1600, and there are a couple of storefronts and it is just one of the storefronts that is in question and the changing of the use to vocal point. And while it seems that most of the attention to this property came about because of the conditional use application that they have on file for a wireless facility, what is going on here and the activity is not related to the wireless facility that they have an application in for but in relation for the change of use fo ....
The active commercial uses and it says that if it is not on that list, then it needs a conditional use authorization and then the Planning Commission heard this legislation in june of last year and it was very clear to them what the supervisors intent was on this legislation and so i have highlighted on the overhead is a passage that all of the ncds and several and i think that there were four neighborhood districts created in the sunset. That used to be nc one and two, Zoning Districts that were created and named with the commercial districts and so this was a terrible cd and these are all ncd and any ground for a commercial use that was not active as defined as 145. 4 would require a conditional use authorization and a business and professional service use is not one of these as defined as active and 135. 4, but i think that it is clear here what the requirements are ....
It says that if it is not on that list, then it needs a conditional use authorization and then the Planning Commission heard this legislation in june of last year and it was very clear to them what the supervisors intent was on this legislation and so i have highlighted on the overhead is a passage that all of the ncds and several and i think that there were four neighborhood districts created in the sunset. That used to be nc one and two, Zoning Districts that were created and named with the commercial districts and so this was a terrible cd and these are all ncd and any ground for a commercial use that was not active as defined as 145. 4 would require a conditional use authorization and a business and professional service use is not one of these as defined as active and 135. 4, but i think that it is clear here what the requirements are that a conditional use authori ....
Which is 145. 4 c, which lists the active commercial uses and it says that if it is not on that list, then it needs a conditional use authorization and then the Planning Commission heard this legislation in june of last year and it was very clear to them what the supervisors intent was on this legislation and so i have highlighted on the overhead is a passage that all of the ncds and several and i think that there were four neighborhood districts created in the sunset. That used to be nc one and two, Zoning Districts that were created and named with the commercial districts and so this was a terrible cd and these are all ncd and any ground for a commercial use that was not active as defined as 145. 4 would require a conditional use authorization and a business and professional service use is not one of these as defined as active and 135. 4, but i think that it is clear ....
Been clear what the proposed use would be. You are saying that it was never routed to you at all. It does not appear to. It has. Commissioners, i will just keep it brief. We did get a complaint on december the 5th that there was work without a permit. I checked the complaint status today. It just is still references that the case was received and the inspectors did not give a work without a permit of violation whether he didnt get in or had a discussion. It seems like the permit was applied for on the fourth of december and then obtained on the 6th of december and sustaineded on the tenth of december. And so there was a tight time line of events. But to say there was no stop work order issued. Regarding the use, and i see the routing did not, it does not show that it got routed to the Planning Department on the issue ans on the permit details report. The Building Depart ....