it says that if it is not on that list, then it needs a conditional use authorization and then the planning commission heard this legislation in june of last year and it was very clear to them what the supervisor s intent was on this legislation and so i have highlighted on the overhead is a passage that all of the ncds and several and i think that there were four neighborhood districts created in the sunset. that used to be nc one and two, zoning districts that were created and named with the commercial districts and so this was a terrible cd and these are all ncd and any ground for a commercial use that was not active as defined as 145.4 would require a conditional use authorization and a business and professional service use is not one of these as defined as active and 135.4, but i think that it is clear here what the requirements are that a conditional use authorization is required. the permit holder is correct in that we did suggest some recommended changes to the legisl
the active commercial uses and it says that if it is not on that list, then it needs a conditional use authorization and then the planning commission heard this legislation in june of last year and it was very clear to them what the supervisor s intent was on this legislation and so i have highlighted on the overhead is a passage that all of the ncds and several and i think that there were four neighborhood districts created in the sunset. that used to be nc one and two, zoning districts that were created and named with the commercial districts and so this was a terrible cd and these are all ncd and any ground for a commercial use that was not active as defined as 145.4 would require a conditional use authorization and a business and professional service use is not one of these as defined as active and 135.4, but i think that it is clear here what the requirements are that a conditional use authorization is required. the permit holder is correct in that we did suggest some re
been clear what the proposed use would be. you are saying that it was never routed to you at all. it does not appear to. it has. commissioners, i will just keep it brief. we did get a complaint on december the 5th that there was work without a permit. i checked the complaint status today. it just is still references that the case was received and the inspectors did not give a work without a permit of violation whether he didn t get in or had a discussion. it seems like the permit was applied for on the fourth of december and then obtained on the 6th of december and sustaineded on the tenth of december. and so there was a tight time line of events. but to say there was no stop work order issued. regarding the use, and i see the routing did not, it does not show that it got routed to the planning department on the issue ans on the permit details report. the building department, i think that it came in as an existing office and proposed office it would not have shown us
is not in irvine as alleged by mr. williams. excuse me one minute. at this point i will just turn in the various documents including irs documents and edd documents and secretary of state documents indicating very clearly what the use is financial services. thank you. sorry, i forgot, it has been a wild to ask if you will accept these? and unfortunately. we did not make all of the copies. has the appellant seen this? no, we just got these today. i have not shown them to him. we do have a copy. sorry. did you hand in a copy? we just came. yeah. we just received these today. you just received the documents on the secretary of state. unfortunately we just ordered them this afternoon. they did not come from the secretary of state it came from their website. okay could you tell me what is on them, again? could you tell me what is represented in the documents? sure. there is a website of the secretary of state, which is called business entity details
gearing up for round two. the two men will have their second one-on-one summit this week in vietnam, and denuclearization is still the big topic on the table. president trump already setting up his pitch to kim jong-un on twitter, saying this, chairman kim realizes perhaps better than anyone else that without nuclear weapons, his country could fast become one of the great economic powers anywhere in the world, end quote. after the first summit, trump claimed there s, quote, no longer a nuclear threat, end quote, from north korea and that he had a, quote, special bond with kim jong-un. but a senior administration official says the u.s. does not know if north korea has made the decision to denuclearize. thus, there is no commitment to any timeline. this morning secretary of state mike pompeo told cnn what the u.s. needs from this summit. you have to go back to where we entered this in the trump administration to think about the path forward. we ve always known this would take