would be reversed, giving them another opportunity to blame republicanens. take a look. people think that the president of the uniteicans.d states, ther for debt forgiveness. s he does not. can he can postpone. he can p delayostpon. but he does not have that power. that would tha power t to bef congress. i m prepared to write off the $10,000 debt, but not 50. mr. president, let me ask you, because i don t think i have the authority to do it tigning a two year. yeah. and while the left spent the day complaining about the decisiont spening abou, mant celebrated the victory for millions of hardworking taxpayere victs, including missy senator eric schmidt, who launched thiers lawsuit whem he was attorney general of his state. schmidt wrote on twitter twittet biden s bailout was, quote, fundamentally unfair, unlawful and a cynica l election ploy,s woul adding that those without loans should notd have to pay off everyone else s. what a concept. senator schmidt join ons us n
but the big guy says this fight isn t over. you know, these r republican officials just couldn tep bear the thought of providing relief for working class, middle clas s americans to up fighting for you. we ll use every tool at e studentsal , get you the student debt relief you need and reach your dreams. why didyour d you give millie borrowers false hope. i didn t get mars false hopei ,but the republicans snatched away the hope thatca they were given. and it s real, real hope. did you overstep your authorit > ? i think the court misinterpreted the constitution . here it goes. but maybe biden should savefh some of that anger for nancyat pelosi. the supreme court actually using the former speaker s own words inin their ruling. people think that the president of the unite d states, the power for debt forgiveness. r for he does not. he can postpone. he can delay. but he does not have thatas to power. that would have to bbe an ace a. congress. yeah, as yo u imagine
well, i like i like o hangino out with old people and young people. othepl r in the middle for. yeah, that s awesome. aweso, laura is abandoning these hand-offs. isn t that sad? oh, no abandese , no. i know she s not quitting. i believe in hernow. and claudiy oh, thank you.ow. including right now, sadly. all right. have a greata , this show. have a great time. laura ingraham, this is the ingraham angle from washington tonight. my angle on the fraud that is biden nomics a little later in the shos w. first, the extent has been weakened by recent events. t it s hard to tell, but is it?el clearly the war in iraqlosing th losing war at home and he has become a bit of a fle yo around the world. i spoke to a white house official about that who really downplayedwhite ho that. they said, look, presidents spend a lot of time talking. and so they re going to be moments when they confuse words. but there s no confus doubt that those moments will be under heavy scrutiny. b
doctored out, you know, whatever that you, you know, step thing he does to south lawn and with an unusual mark on his now look really closely because apparently he just removed what s called a cpap machine moments earlier. he was just sleepy. well, you know, he needs to be friends with mark levin because you get a call at 7 a.m.. did you read this piece, adam schiff? and i m like, no. anyway, according to reports, biden goes to bed early, wakes up. his few lucid hours are largely unprintable with few scheduled events, as we all know. still, there are much bigger problems at 1600 pennsylvania avenue tonight than biden s mental and physical decline. biden s house of cards mark my words, it is crumbling before this nation s eyes. the media have been ignoring it. they will not be able to ignore much longer. now his beloved attorney general, merrick garland, now been exposed. garland has promised over and over again that the u.s. attorney look into hunter biden. david weiss
i don t agree. this this after a group of asian-american students filed complaint against harvard and the university of north carolinaa hill, alleging that ta they failed to employ racet neutral admissions practices. now the majority opinion delivered, chief justice john roberts said that any studenn t, quote, must be treat based on his or her experiencebs . an individual not on the basis of race, highlighting the importance of this case in a rare move. noarw justices clarence thomas d and sonia sotomayor also and actually read their opinions from the bench now, with justice thomas declaring, quote, at alnow l forms discrimination based on race, including so-called action, areo prohibited under the u.s. co. titutionhi now, a harvard did, in fact, release a statement following the decision acknowledging that the court ruled their admissions policies did not comply with the 14th amendment, the equal protection clause in the constitution and the civil rights act. but harvar la