or, you know, move one way or another. the other thing with respect to playing it out until all of the witnesses testify is a rabbit hole in the sense the courts could take a year or more to resolve all of those matters. if you believe that the president abused the powers of his office, and there is sufficient evidence to sanction him, then there is no reason to wait for a year or more to present evidence which presently exists. let me ask you this. this sounds like potentially a censor. you want to say what the president did, you do not approve of, but if you dopt not think you ve gotten to the additional step of removing him from office, why not go until you believe you would get that evidence? well, because of the time line. victor, i m not arguing against that. there is the possibility that that is the best strategy. if tomorrow s hearing doesn t convince america that there is
again, i have a time line for you. as a candidate, can you direct [ inaudible ]. what is that? as a candidate [ inaudible ]? yes. [ inaudible question ] what is that? a lot of considerations and i m thinking about it. can you give us an example? no. americans are just sick of the typical politician who says one thing out in public and then goes behind closed doors and doesn t want anyone to know what they are saying to the millionaires and billionaires that are funding this campaign. this is about the conflicts that he is creating every single day right now. joining me now is errol louis, host of the podcast you decide. and a cnn political comermentat.
thank you for joining us. pete buttigieg is surging in the polls and getting more scrutiny. you say him in that news conference doesn t want to talk about the why he is won t up his fund-raisers to the public and the media. what is your take on that? i think what we see going on here is that pete buttigieg has already hit a bit of a rough patch when it comes to who is raising money for him and bundling money for him and holding fund-raisers and where he is showing up. he had to give some money back. a city attorney who was involved in a very controversial police killing case involving laquan mcdonald in chicago and it turned out that one of the people who cohosted a big fund-raiser for him was involved in that case in a very negative way. pete buttigieg didn t want to sort of be in bed on that issue so, he sort of returned the money and said, it wouldn t happen again. but, of course, it raises the question if he is going around doing these fund-raisers, who else might be sponsoring h
for several weeks. metabolic changes may occur. movement dysfunction, restlessness, sleepiness, stomach issues are common side effects. when bipolar i overwhelms, vraylar helps smooth the ups and downs. there is disturbing information about the gunman behind friday s attack on a navy base in pensacola. the new york times says mohammed alshamrani watched mass shooting videos at a dinner party the night before the shooting. for more on saudi arabia s reaction to this let s go live to nic. what are the saudis saying publicly? reporter: the reaction is to distance themselves from the attacker, essentially not in our name, this doesn t represent the country is what we have heard from his tribe. his family have said that they