or, you know, move one way or another. the other thing with respect to playing it out until all of the witnesses testify is a rabbit hole in the sense the courts could take a year or more to resolve all of those matters. if you believe that the president abused the powers of his office, and there is sufficient evidence to sanction him, then there is no reason to wait for a year or more to present evidence which presently exists. >> let me ask you this. this sounds like potentially a censor. you want to say what the president did, you do not approve of, but if you dopt not think you've gotten to the additional step of removing him from office, why not go until you believe you would get that evidence? >> well, because of the time line. victor, i'm not arguing against that. there is the possibility that that is the best strategy. if tomorrow's hearing doesn't convince america that there is