Stay updated with breaking news from Tommy check in. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
basically they essentially say they did not stand back on when the order came out it wasn t done with enough comfortable between the government and the defense. they just won a few more days to do it. basically, they don t have enough time to respond. they want a few more days to do it. that doesn t mean it will be granted. in the first instance even before judge chutkan does on the first. machanguana more time to respond to the protective order. jordan reuben. thank, you appreciated. we want to bring in maryland democratic congresswoman, glenn ivey. great to have you on. not only as a lawmaker but also as a former federal prosecutor. we have a lot of questions for you in that realm, as well. talk me through this asking the protective order. what do you make of the statement made by the former president the united states? you come for me, i m gonna come for you. if there is any way that any judge, chutkan or anyone else, can rein in someone like donald ....
Trump? well, it is going to be hard. i think he has demonstrated over some of the cases that he doesn t like to be rained. and he wants to continue to make statements. it appears that he has concluded at this point it is politically beneficial for him to continue to make the statements. to help him with raising money. he s using a lot of the money to pay for his attorneys. it might be challenging to do that. having said that, judge chutkan is a pretty serious, tough, judge. very experienced. in, fact she was a trial lawyer in her. past she knows how to deal with these kinds of difficulties. i think that she she is nobody to play with. i understand that he has a political tract but he is focusing on. trump also needs to think about the courtroom track. there could be sanctions. or punishment for this down at the end of the road. i want to talk about this letter that you signed on to to ....
Scalia, scalia, he is like a god. go to u.s. v williams, and you will see the supreme court, scalia, explaining conspiracy, incitement. those are exceptions. those are legalese. let me put it in plain, simple, terms. conspiracy means two people discussing, two or more people, a crime. talking. it freedom of speech would block that, he would never have any conspiracies. a mob boss orders a hit. it s the mob boss not responsible to the murder because he spoke the words? it is a preposterous statement, yasmin. and plays well with the base but it will be laughed out of court by judge chutkan. i love the slide. the president is not king. and the plaintiffs is not president. jack smith was obviously very deliberate about the words he chose in this 45-page indictment. you talked about inciting the insurrection. one of the notable reasons why ....
187,000 new jobs. america s economic future looks bright. president biden and i will keep fighting to move our nation forward. also ahead, medical breakthrough, the first pill ever approved to treat postpartum depression. we will have more on potential game-changer for new moms coming up. incredible stuff. we begin, a course, once again with the breaking news. trump s team given until monday evening to respond to a doj or request to a protective order hoping to put a stop to trump s threats like this. if you come after me, i m coming after you. this, despite the judges warning not to make threats against those who may come forward with information on the case. i want to bring in jordan reuben. right before the deadline, legal analyst for nbc.com. you notice that the judge, tommy check-in, was the one who denied trump s request to block the release of records to the january six committee. quote, she wrote than that ....