eighty two . she s currently serving in congressth term . wow. shefi first assumed her house seat. eachthirty five years ago on j 9th. nineteen eighty seven .ti a different lifetime in politics and the culture. mr. gorbachev, tear down this wall. nobody disputes whatever happened to a new man in . i ve concluded that i will stop being a candidate for president of the united states likeof yesterday. oh , she s been speaker since 2019 and before that from 2007 to 2011.20 and democrats love though because she s a first the first woman speaker of the house. and no matter what her record , the press adulation, it nevers stops. she is a canny legislator. she knows how to get things done or historic figure. but more importantlys, nancyly pelosi runs a very, very disciplined caucus. speaker pelosiate is brilliant is she s a fantastic speaker. but we re here to ask what does nancy have to show for all these years in office when she first took over as speaker, democrats had two hu
is of the 5.lert fox news alert the house and voted to 162 07 to hold merrico garland in contempt for refusing to hand over the robert heardle interview. every republican voted yes except 1 ohio congressman davidn joy s whd o voted no. what s next that s what everyons is wondering because in terms of the contempt it s up to doj to decide if they pressed chargesfr and go after their boss it s unlikely they do that and house republicans know that as the swinan ae why they will force am of vote on inherent contempt. that s what they saw on the house floor this evening basically meaning if it passes the house sergeant at arms willr be forceced to go and the rest g merrick garland because he is in contempt a privilege motion can bring that to a vote in the next 2 legislative days having eyesot on or after they voted on theha house floos r not doing that jut yett the may be trying gathert o support for that resolution a historic day of the house first time in a long time they vote
raised us on her own.th this whole neighborhood felt like family. so when obama s trade deal threatened jobs here , i voted against it and i voted with trump on trade. freii don t answer to any political party. i answer to the folks i grew up with . that said, we decided to examine his record because he sounds like that s a populist. he voted with pelosi 95% of the time duringhi his timeor in congress and with biden get ready for it. 100% of the time. so he s trying to steal your america first populist mantle. ,e will the voters by this year upe by just three points right now in the latest poll? yeah, of course trump wasy only up by by a pointup in ohio according to the polls, butbo he won by eight 1/2 points. i feel veryy good about a race. look, the mistake that tim ryan is making is that he assumes those of us in ohioio who actually vote that we re t a bunch of idiots and we re not right. we can examine this guy s record . he didn t support trump s trade deals. he actively worked ag
serious side effects may happen, including pancreatitis, so stop taking victoza® and call your doctor right away if you have severe pain in your stomach area. tell your doctor your medical history. taking victoza® with a sulfonylurea or insulin may cause low blood sugar. the most common side effects are headache, nausea, diarrhea, and vomiting. side effects can lead to dehydration, which may cause kidney problems. now s the timeor better moment of pro ask your doctor about victoza®. dental professionals recommend using an electric toothbrush. for an exceptionally fresh feeling choose philips sonicare diamondclean. hear the difference versus oral b. in a recently published clinical study, philips sonicare diamondclean outperforms oral-b 7000, removing up to 82% more plaque and improving gum health up to 70% more. its sonic technology cleaning deep between teeth. from the most recommended sonic toothbrush brand by dental professionals. switch to philips sonicare today. philips sonicar
nuclear war. that s been a problem, in my mind, a with all presidents and of course a problem with this president. and is there any method that you can conceive of that would somehow remove that power from the presidency as we have discussed on this program in past. sometimes with the possibility of incoming nuclear attack. a president would have six minutes or less to decide to retaliate. in that kind of scenario, is there any alternative to just entrusting all of this power in one person? with the constitution of course faces responsibility for making war with the cons gres. the president can propose the congress has to approve of it. on the other hand, you can say, in the case after nuclear war and veents may happen to fast. ere is no timeor congress. what we can do is require at the president not launch a nuclear war absent an actual nuclear detonation in our