All he wanted to do was impede a process thats, well, its stated there in the constitution. Thats all he wanted. Like a bank robber, all i wanted to do was rob a bank. Take all the money. This is exactly what he is charged for, and he admitted it. Yeah. You know, watching mr. Lauro and political defenders like Lindsey Graham, well talk about him in a minute, attempt to defend donald trump over the last couple days, its clear they dont have a lot to work with. Mr. Lauro is a real attorney, unlike some of the other attorneys trump had around him. He was a prosecutor. If he cant seem to come up with a cogent theory of the case of why donald trump was acting legally around the 2020 election in the days leading up to january 6th, because the evidence in the indictment, the allegations in that indictment are so overwhelming, theyre Hopscotching Around, hoping to find something. Nothing is hitting yet. Well, of course, theyre not going to find anything legally because theyre boxed in legal le
trey: good evening and thank you for joining us, i m trey gowdy, and it is sunday night in america. in 230 years, only three u.s. presidents have been impeached, none has been convicted. the standard is high crimes and misdemeanors but what does that mean? what is the real standard for removing a duly elected president? what is the standard for launching an impeachment inquiry. the house voted to open a formal impeachment inquiry to president joe biden and enables the house to seek certain information and evidence and likely places the house in a better legal position to get that information should the matter wind up in court. house democrats impeached former president donald trump twice. the first impeachment was bipartisan only and that both republicans and democrats voted against it. but house democrats and the dc media were undeterred. the second time president trump was impeached shortly before he left office. neither impeachment came close to conviction. are we headed t
trey: good evening and thank you for joining us, i m trey gowdy, and it is sunday night in america. in 230 years, only three u.s. presidents have been impeached, none has been convicted. the standard is high crimes and misdemeanors but what does that mean? what is the real standard for removing a duly elected president? what is the standard for launching an impeachment inquiry. the house voted to open a formal impeachment inquiry to president joe biden and enables the house to seek certain information and evidence and likely places the house in a better legal position to get that information should the matter wind up in court. house democrats impeached former president donald trump twice. the first impeachment was bipartisan only and that both republicans and democrats voted against it. but house democrats and the dc media were undeterred. the second time president trump was impeached shortly before he left office. neither impeachment came close to conviction. are we headed t
trey: good evening and thank you for joining us, i m trey gowdy, and it is sunday night i trey: good evening, trey gowdy. only three u.s. presidents have been impeached, none convicted. the standard is high crimes and misdemeanors, but what does that mean? what is the standard for removing a duly elected president and what is standard for launching an impeachment inquiry? the vote inables the house to seek certain information and evidence should the matter wind up in court. d former president donald trump twice. the first impeachment was bipartisan only and that both republicans and democrats voted against it. but house democrats and the dc media were undeterred. the second time president trump was impeached shortly before he left office. neither impeachment came close to conviction. are we headed toward a new constitutional norm where my president of the other party will be investigated and peached? what due process was president trump afforded? will that be the same for c
regarding the grant termination. does that violate policy? it was inappropriate for him to go doing that for a grantee as a conflict of interest, among other things. on march 29, 2021, dr. morens edited a letter that dr. das yak was sending to nih. does that violate policy? yes. he provided him with advice regarding how to mislead nih on eco health s late progress report. does that violate policy? it was wrong and inappropriate and violated policy. on december 7th, 2021, dr. morens wrote to the chair of eco health s board of directors to quote put in a word, end quote, for the doctor. does that violate policy? should not have done that. that was wrong. it violates policy. i m not sure of a specific policy. i imagine it does. he should not have been doing that. in addition to all those actions dr. morens wrote to the doctor peter from tony s recent comments to me they are trying to protect you, end quote. did you ever talk to dr. morens about dr. daczak and e