department recalled her two months, threarly from her post. at the time, the word out of foggy bottom is this was as planned. the countries does have a history with corruption and these problems. what you saw is a reaction on capitol hill and among other diplomats, sort of confusion, so to speak over why she would be taken out. do you have any sense as to why she was allowed to give her deposition? she is, as you outlined in other reports, central in all of this because she, i guess, begins the entire ukraine story for us, if you want to use that as a central plot point. why was she ultimately allowed to appear today in congress? why did we not get a sense that the white house or state department wanted to block her testimony? it is a little bit of an open question right now. when you look at somebody she was at the center of all of this. she was at the center of rudy