It took a tumble in less than six weeks and then rebounded 36 of the lows from april yesterday. The s p down 34 from february 19 to march 23, less than five weeks. Crazy to think about how quickly that fall came then we were back up 30 off the low for april. Joe . If you used april then i could get to 82 years i dont think sorkin was listening to me. I was i said, no, i dont remember. You are always saying maybe i wasnt around for that here is my proposition for you, andrew sell in may is a common expression go away ive never felt more like selling in may than i do right now. I have to be honest. It is not just you. Look at the dow this morning down 454 points. Just to test whether this kind of thing works. It would be impossible for me to go long with money what was he, 163 or something. I saw another guy say it is going to be so hard over the next year that we are looking at another 40 drop others that say the average recession that the market doesnt bottom for 11 months although jim
Any questions. Weve tried to be transparent with the department of dbi and planning to move this forward. I think the issue before you is actually a very, very simple issue. As i understand it, this is an appeal from the categorical exemption of seekwa, it is not a rereview of everything that went on before the board of appeals and Planning Department. There is a lot that has gone on that you are not privy to. I will address the two questions by the supervisors just recently as i go through this, but the log does not support the appellant, the law says if they have done proper analysis and there is substantial evidence that supports them, and there is no new construction or major changed condition, then theyre findings are supposed to be affirmed and thats what the law says. The facts of this case actually support irving that the planning everything that the Planning Department has said and that this is categorically exempt. This hearing is about the categorical exemption, not everythi
Any questions. Weve tried to be transparent with the department of dbi and planning to move this forward. I think the issue before you is actually a very, very simple issue. As i understand it, this is an appeal from the categorical exemption of seekwa, it is not a rereview of everything that went on before the board of appeals and Planning Department. There is a lot that has gone on that you are not privy to. I will address the two questions by the supervisors just recently as i go through this, but the log does not support the appellant, the law says if they have done proper analysis and there is substantial evidence that supports them, and there is no new construction or major changed condition, then theyre findings are supposed to be affirmed and thats what the law says. The facts of this case actually support irving that the planning everything that the Planning Department has said and that this is categorically exempt. This hearing is about the categorical exemption, not everythi
1985, you brought forth the original notice of violation . The reason is, nobody was able to use the garages. As roger was talking about the back door and photographs here prove, it was impossible to use the garages. They were built in 1997. There is no proof they were built at separate moments in time. Do you have something on the projector . I apologize. Can you show tv what is on the projector. And can you step back, please, thank you. Thank you, president breed. So basically, the people who built the garage just after the yes sold it, talked to about the permit. What year was this . Fall of 1997 approximately. And they were building them together. They were not built separately, they were built together. Yeah. And when they finished them, i asked them if they had a permit, nothing ever came through, nothing was done. And then it was clear to them, the owners themselves, it was impossible to use the garages. Like all of us in small spaces, we go on with our lives when nothing is bot
Today, Campaign Materials in San Francisco will have to include the original source of the funds for third party expenditures when an individual has given over 20,000. Billionaires and corporate interests will no longer be able to hide behind political committees. Audio and video ads on television, radio and social media, will not be required to begin their ad with a clear disclosure of who the funders of the ad are before the ad even begins. Candidates for official office must test under penalty of perjury, they are not working with committees. This includes social media advertising, along with what we currently require of mailers, audio and video advertisement, which means a copy of the social media ads and vendor that was paid, what the vendor provided and the target audience of the social media ads. This legislation will require that ethics mail a separate pamphlet 30 days prior to every registered San Francisco voter explaining the history of Third Party Spending and what was spen