Third Department Decision News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Stay updated with breaking news from Third department decision. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.

Top News In Third Department Decision Today - Breaking & Trending Today

Challenging Releases And Settlements Based On Fraudulent Inducement Is A Challenge - Criminal Law

In my July 8, 2019 post, I reviewed the law on challenging releases and settlements based upon alleged claims of fraud and fraudulent inducement. ....

United States , New York , City Of New York , Flemingv Ponziani , Pappasv Tzolis , Prindlev Guzy , Centro Empresarial Cempresa , Paul Westheim , Charlotte Weidler , Liquoriv Liquori , Mariana Frenk Westheim , Mccoyv Feinman , Centro Empresarial , At Healthcare Inc , First Department Decision , Bank United States , York Court , Third Department Decision , Cinteractive Corp , Bny Co , First Department Follows Centro Affirming Dismissal , Third Department , Supreme Court Coccoma , First Department , Kafa Invs , Supreme Court ,

NY's Third Department Holds Action Enforcing Note Is Neither Barred by Estoppel Doctrines Nor the Applicable Statute of Limitations | Blank Rome LLP

In
CitiMortgage, Inc. v. Ramirez, 2020 WL 7647749, at 3 (3d Dept. Dec. 24, 2020), the Appellate Division, Third Department, held that CitiMortgage, Inc.’s action to recover under a note (i) was not precluded because of CitiMortgage, Inc.’s right to an election of remedies; and (ii) was timely because the statute of limitations was tolled during the pendency of the prior foreclosure action.
Summary of Facts & Background
In May 2010, plaintiff, CitiMortgage, Inc. (“Plaintiff”), commenced an action to foreclose against borrower, Jose Ramirez (“Borrower”) (the “First Foreclosure Action”). The foreclosure action was dismissed in October 2013 for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff moved to vacate the dismissal, which was denied in April 2015. In 2017, plaintiff commenced a second foreclosure action (the “Second Foreclosure Action”), which was ultimately dismissed on the grounds that the statute of limitations to foreclose had expired in May 2016. The Court ....

New York , United States , Appellate Division , Lower Court , Third Department , Citimortgage Inc , Third Department Decision , Schenectady County Supreme Court Lower , Jose Ramirez , Schenectady County Supreme Court , First Foreclosure , Second Foreclosure Action , First Foreclosure Action , New York Appellate Divisions , புதியது யார்க் , ஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில் , மேல்முறையீடு பிரிவு , கீழ் நீதிமன்றம் , மூன்றாவது துறை , மூன்றாவது துறை முடிவு , ஸ்ச்செநெகித்ததி கவுண்டி உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் கீழ் , ஜோசே ரெமிரெஸ் , ஸ்ச்செநெகித்ததி கவுண்டி உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் , முதல் முன்கூட்டியே , இரண்டாவது முன்கூட்டியே நடவடிக்கை , முதல் முன்கூட்டியே நடவடிக்கை ,