Stay updated with breaking news from Think roberts. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
than $725 billion for lawsuits and without its biggest, brightest star, tucker carlson the new york times reports that his departure is made more stun big the fact that the network did nothing after carlson pushed the envelope over and over, pedaling inflammatory information. quote, the network stuck by him after carlson claimed that immigration had made america, quote, poor and dirty. he seemed to shrug off a racist conspiracy theory known as the great replacement, along with the fact that when russia invaded ukraine, he seemed to promote russia s point of view the fallout from carlson s ouster is unclear. quote, mr. carlson s rise prefigured trump s takeover of the republican party his own conversion from bow tied libertarian to popularist remade the party. he prospered with trump s presidency he made frank nativism the primary touch stones of republican politics. if fox and its host prospered because of trump, their efforts to deny the presidential results threw th ....
Exists they do have a system, but again, it s policed by themselves, individually anyone would have known, unlike the thomas situation, greenberg has 22 cases in which gorsuch was involved you don t have to necessarily recuse, but that blank box really is deafeningly silent the question is could his objectivity reasonably have been questioned i want to be clear, though, i don t think roberts can impose it by edict. but there is a place, as dahlia is suggesting, where they are nine in the room and saying, guys we re getting clobbered with a 2 by 4. they re not going to be able to go backwards and punish thomas, et cetera. but let s adopt these things voluntarily so we don t have to make the constitutional judgment and do it. what s the big deal? we re getting clobbered, and needlessly becoming part of the issue. that decision can maybe happen, ....
I don t think they have six. i don t think roberts would go for it. but he i think he ll go for the mississippi law, which bans it after 15 weeks which is a huge assault on roe. not a good day. it s not. in states like yours and welcome to the show gary chambers junior. in states like yours, this is probably going to be one of the big incentives for republicans to not vote for you if they like you in other ways. their only issue is abortion. that s all they vote on. they don t care about anything else. how do you run for statewide office against kennedy, the road scholar and used to be a democrat, how do you run in a state where all, a lot of voters care about is abortion? the reality is we ve allowed a narrative. there are a lot of people that want the right to choose. it s our job to ignite the base ....
Philosophy [inaudible] the constitution as it s written. he decided the law is a particular thing, when the next case comes along and we support that and build on it. what s happened is is this is not the roberts court anymore, we ve tilted to the right. and there is no, star oreo just isis s great along with thomas agrees with it that row should be weighed should be overturned. i don t think roberts wants it, i think people that s why he voted with the liberal justices on the texas cased. but he s not in the majority in that. the republicans have said they were going to overturn roe v. wade, they said they were going to appoint justices that wanted to, and now they have the majority of the justice, we are set to face that, that s what s happened. doctor redlener, over to medicine we go. it is flu shot season, an increasing talk about widening ....
Have something to say. but it is an interesting resonance of history that you stated, she came from maine. i think when you come to the idea of roe v wade, and the to take away the undue burden question, throw it out the door, i don t think roberts would do that on his own but if there were people pushing for that who knows what he would hold on to. part of issue here is the degree to which republicans and donald trump can galvanize republicans around his nominees. halle jackson, for all this people think this president is wanton and reckless about stuff, he is not wanton and reckless about court nominees, particularly at the supreme court level. there have been a couple of federal court nominees that have ....