Stay updated with breaking news from Thi misstatement. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
goes to trial in just over 1 hours. plus, even more allegations of wrongdoing have emerging and supreme court justice clarence thomas but what are democrats gonna d about it and the gop s dog and pony sho comes to manhattan jim jordan desperate attempt t attack the man holding donal trump to account good evening i m mehdi hassan. tomorrow morning in a court in wilmington, delaware, fox will finally be put on trial for it lies the media giant is facing landmark defamation case fro dominion voting systems, who allege that fox knowingl pushed false claims that they re voting machines rig th 2020 election. they didn t. in the days and weeks afte that election, fox and its hos devoted hours of primetime t coverage to the voting machine company. dominion voting systems ink dominion voting systems dominion voting systems dominion voting systems dominion voting systems dominion voting systems dominion. dominion voting systems division voting systems now, ove ....
A subpoena as a good first step we have to remember that clarence thomas has been 3 years choosing all of th environments in which he speaks, choosing which question he i axed, choosing what audience before him he has been able to massage, and finance his public image s perfectly up until this poin because he is absolute control trying to get him before a skeptical senate panel rip requiring him to answe questions honestly under oath, where he has not approve the questions beforehand, where he does have an obligation to the truth. that would be his firs experience doing that since hi confirmation, and i think will be very healthy first start. articles of impeachment migh come after that, it might be a good way to try and force hi before the committee if he refuses to testify, but this i not something that senat democrats should pass off to the judicial conference, thi fall squarely within the jurisdiction, and they need to act now. they also had a fully functioning judiciary committe ....
Estate from that has not existed since 2006, over int reporting today from the washington post. is it any wonder that there ar now calls for clarence thoma to appear in front of th senate judiciary committee, an even be subpoenaed by them i need be? and yes, there is a preceden for subpoenaing supreme cour justices in 1953, the house on american activities committee subpoenaed associate justice tom clark. so why not thomas? what happened to accountability? joining me now to discuss al of this, is mark stern, senior writer at slate covering court in the law and brittany cunningham, and espy political analyst thank you both for joining me. britney, i want to start wit you on this new reporting from the washington post today. the article notes that thi misstatement is a series o errors, animations thomas ha made on financial disclosure forms. and people make errors when it comes to for voting, they do but at this point does clarenc thomas deserve the benefit o the doubt? he s clearly not ....