i don t see any validity to it. in fact, i think that the american public saw a really great process over the past week. and a cross-section of americans are going to serve in that jury, including their news sources, varied, new sources varied walks of life. and if anything, i think it really undermines the idea that he s going to get a better venue somewhere else. this is really just, americans have proven to the judge and as well too, what else we can see from their interrogatories that they will try to be impartial and that they will be impartial so i think he s actually gotten a pretty fair shake in terms of the jury that s come out of this process. and now we re off to see what will happen with the actual trials. nothing that i think is going to stop it or move it to another location. buckle up. i know where we will all be at 9:30 on monday morning. and you ll probably i ll be back here throughout the day. and when? monday night. thank you all. i ve run next the breaking news.
there. i just think it s too risky you re thinking logically hi, brian trial, which i would imagine his attorneys are also thinking logically. i m sure one would think right. here s a solid, i mean, these are attorneys that i think many of you at this table. no. actually, as certainly i know number of our legal alice do when we look at this, there was also the separate hearing, ryan, today. yet another appeal from team trump for a change of venue. so the judge did not hi, the stay in that as this as this moves through court, donald trump once again saying he can t get a fair trial in new york. he was complaining after leaving court today that this was moving too fast. this is the interests of the judge. they ceded a jury so quickly, it s actually a fairly diverse well-rounded jury. when you look at it how do you think this will play out? there was also this argument that it was untenable, right? that it was untenable in terms of the jurors, that there was some sort of some sort of bi