san jose camera, clear skies. san jose, low 50s for santa rosa. through the day, daytime highs above average this time of the year. 76 in oakland. 86 in san jose, and heating up inland, concord topping out at 92 degrees, and we will talk about the cooldown, looking ahead to the next few days, and then heating back up. we will have the holiday weekend forecast as well. back to you. governor newsom will be in pittsburgh to give an update on the state initiative that secures hotel and motel rooms to protect the homeless from covid-19. when the pandemic hit, the state started to set aside rooms to help homeless socially distance. so far only those who have tested positive or are symptomatic have been able to live in the rooms. statewide there s only a third of the rooms filled, leaving a large number of people on the street. there s a large number that are still vacant, and many homeless people who have not been accepted through the process they have set up. we don t understa
impact of fossil fuel usage. second, the committee is encourages by the six-point recommendation for taking action on this topic, but would like to request more information regarding specific timelines for each of the action items lefted in the staff plan. the committee would like to communicate their grave concern regarding the possibility of a mass divestment of fossil fuels within a short time frame. the committee would advocate that the board undertake no such rash action until completing a complete analysis of the financial impact the effect it would have on pension performance and costs. we appreciate and understand the desire to divest from fossil fuels from different entities, but we must understand the implications of such a decision before it s made. sorry. time. thank you very much. again, everyone has 1 minute. we re going to announce loudly when you are at your 1-minute mark. understand the constraints we have. sara greenwald, are you present? seeing she s
would have on pension performance and costs. we appreciate and understand the desire to divest from fossil fuels from different entities, but we must understand the implications of such a decision before it s made. sorry. time. thank you very much. again, everyone has 1 minute. we re going to announce loudly when you are at your 1-minute mark. understand the constraints we have. sara greenwald, are you present? seeing she s not here. i will set her speaker card aside. phil casky, followed by margaret pierce. phil casky, retired from the water department. i think i want to say briefly the water department is an incredibly wonderful system. it s one of the most protected systems in the world. and we didn t get that way by being unprotective of the environment. so burning fossil fuels is not protective of the environment. and i would like to keep the water system the way it is and i think that san francisco can be a leader in many, many ways and by divesting is one way
that we double up in this category then? you are a consultant. you are giving us advice for now and in the future. so if you believe it s going to go up, why was that not in the recommendation that came before the board? everybody in this room needs to understand that you hold securities in two places. you give them to managers and those managers make the decision on if the security is attractively valued or not. as a consultant, why don t you recommend us investing more money in the field if you think it s going to go up? we re not recommending adding additional energy to the portfolio unless a manager hired to make that recommendation determines that that s what they should do. we re arguing that you don t take away that choice from them. the figures i quoted to you do not embed an expectation that energy prices will increase. what they do embed is taking energy away diversifies the portfolio. you made a statement that we re making a political statement. could you p