these debates are capturing not young people, but older people, and republicans, is the terror angle. and they are fascinated by it and the media keeps feeding people this kind of, watch out for those terrorists. the media has said nothing about climate change. not much. has any republican congratulated anybody on the climate deal? no. i love, they re so offended that they didn t get congratulated. i think the climate deal was great. the fox news ratings was very good. 25-54 does care when we re doing the debate. trump has been going after ted cruz since his surge in the polls, but rush limbaugh thinks that s a very bad idea. my questioning about the way trump has gone after cruz, calling him a maniac, refusing to work with people in the senate, that s a huge mistake for any of you who are holding out hope that trump is a genuine conservative, genuine conservative, even in the republican field would not go
to make sure we do not shift the conversation, to solely speaking about the terror angle on the shooting in san bernardino, which 100% it was. the bigger point is there was tied to the gun violence issue. as far as his concern, we have spent the better part of three weeks reaching out to him every day. we have extended the offer to write an op-ed for us which would appear in our paper and online. we have heard nothing. the stone walling and the bait and switch that goes on by the lobby from the lobby that he represents to us is a form of terrorism. it terrorizes the safety of innocent american people. you received so much attention online for this next cover. this was a few days after all your gun crusade covers. it says everything is awesome.
the tragedy, you have got making sure there is an investigation on site. i think there is a possibility there was a bomb on board. we are taking that very seriously. martha: gregg palkot joins me from london. what do we know about the possible terror angle that has been discussed since day one to this russian crash? more information point together possibility it was terror that brought down that plane. according to our sister network, u.k. and u.s. intelligence found those clues while they were controlling through communications between isis members. along with specific indications a bomb was placed the in luggage
a plot carried out, thankfully not carried out, but planned by the 9/11 master mind khalid shaikh mohammed to hijack 11 airplanes in southeast asia. some of the 9/11 hijackers passed through that country. if we are considering the terror angle, in western china, where this plane may have been diverted we re founding out, there was a group called the uighurs. they want to break away from china. form their own islamic state and if you want to make political statement against the chinese government, no better way to do it than to hijack a beijing bound plane. the problem is, they re not taking credit and if they want to get attention for who they are, these uighurs, wouldn t they have taken credit for this? well, judge, a few things here. one, they may still have the plane. probably unlikely, but who
a plot carried out, thankfully not carried out, but planned by the 9/11 master mind khalid shaikh mohammed to hijack 11 airplanes in southeast asia. some of the 9/11 hijackers passed through that country. if we are considering the terror angle, in western china, where this plane may have been diverted we re founding out, there was a group called the uighurs. they want to break away from china. form their own islamic state and if you want to make political statement against the chinese government, no better way to do it than to hijack a beijing bound plane. the problem is, they re not taking credit and if they want to get attention for who they are, these uighurs, wouldn t they have taken credit for this? well, judge, a few things here. one, they may still have the plane. probably unlikely, but who