told in no uncertain terms t that the option of the national guard was available to i everybody in power and they didn t take advantage of it. it why isn t that the biggerhe story here ? rewe ve done such an excellent job, sean, of shining a light on this very issue which that president trump authorized the use of the national guard ws and his offer was turned down and there should be an investigation into how many people they see and how meriall- bowzer handled the security ofha the capitol and the citynd. these are the same individuals that stood behind and cheered the riotous mob that attacked the white house and sent dozensd of secret service agents to the hospital and they cheered on nancy pelosi, in, in fact, attacked the victims of the portland siege. so these are people that have been pro riot year after year after year. let s get your take. reince priebus. well,, i mean, it s an amazing situation here tonight.he
0 authoritarian state. that is the destruction of democracy. and we can t let them do it. we re doing our part. thank you for joining us for this hour. have the best evening b with the ones you love.see you we ll see you tomorrow. and welcome to hannity. and we start with the fox news alert breaking tonight . we have all three major broadcast networks, fake news, cnn, msnbc, all happily broadcasting well, the dullest the most boringel. there s absolutely nothingng nothing new . multi hour democratic fundraiser masquerading as a january six hearing. going to and by the sounds of it, they re going to do hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of hours of t us produced by a former abc executive, 100% hollywood production with all the creative licensesere that wd go along with that. butt make no mistake, tonight s so-called hearing is not in good faith. it is not an honest probe into the security breakdown on that fateful day and we will prove that to tonight instead it is i a made for tv smear
that is what the united states is trying to do right now. let s verify that the it erms t held. this is an unbelievably brutal dictatorial totalitarian are a gi regime. we can t trust them for anything. but is it in their interests now to make a deal with the united states of some kind? perhaps. but what would that deal look like. i would not mind in my lifetime having the united korean peninsula, but it would have to be on the south korean model. and north korea doesn t want that because that lose the family, the dynasty. north korea would lose all of their power. i don t see where our two interests in the end will work long time, but for donald trump, if he could just get a short term deal out of this, let s say a freeze for one year let s say, that would help him in the midterm elections coming up because his foreign policy has been all bully boy, name calling, rocket man. and attitudely tzudly t suddenl
testify, the people who are named the three americans who were listed in the new york times report? well, i certainly believe that mike flynn needs to come in and testify. and i think we ve seen bipartisan support for that, having him come in. and with respect to mr. flynn, he he deceived the vice president of the united states. the vice president of the united states then misled the country. that s a serious business. and of course, we know some of the history involving mr. flynn and rt and being paid to attend this conference with putin. so i think he is certainly a witness that we are going to want to bring in before the committee. in erms t in terms of the others, i think we follow the evidence where it leads. what i would like to know is what has the fbi investigated on this, if anything, what have they concluded, and what would the basis be for bringing these conditions or any others, before the committee?
cooperation is working in america and people who want constant conflict. nobody is right all the time. and a broken clock is right twice a day. to have a divide and conquer strategy is nuts. ordinarily i m against recalling election. i went to try to fight one in california. but sometimes it is the only way to avoid a disastrous course. interesting because right now things look pretty good for scott walker. if you look at the polls. we haven t seen a single poll that shows barrett in the lead. most bear out between 5 and 9 point lead. this is the latest from the marquette law school. 50, 45, scott walker doing well ahead the june 5th deadline for that recall. what are the national implications here? we will talk about that later on in the program. what does it mean north battle against public sector unions. what does it mean in terms t of wisconsin clearly being up for grabs if walker wins?