Latest Breaking News On - Tennessee products liability act - Page 1 : comparemela.com

E D Tenn Holds that Plaintiff Materials Expert Opinions Did Not Measure Up

E D Tenn Holds that Plaintiff Materials Expert Opinions Did Not Measure Up
lexology.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from lexology.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.

United statesTerumo medical corpMedical corpTennessee products liability actFederal rules

Another Acetaminophen Step in the Right Direction

Last week we told you about two decisions in the In re Acetaminophen − ASD-ADHD Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 3043, that were improvements…

United statesLiability litigationConsumer protection actTennessee products liability actLaw dictionaryFederal trade commission actAw firmsAw updatesEgal updatesEgal developmentsAw developmentsEgal newslettersEgal current awarenessEgal advisersEgal advisorsEgal directory

The Sixth Circuit Tosses the Specific Defect Requirement under Tennessee Law | Husch Blackwell LLP

Under the Tennessee Products Liability Act, plaintiffs used to be required to identify a specific defect or condition that made the product unreasonably dangerous and proximately caused.

United statesByron blochLynetta hillSteven loudonTyler kressKia motors america incKia motorsCircuit courtTennessee products liability actMotors americaSixth circuit courtJean parksKia defendantsSamuel seroSixth circuitJudge bush

Impact of DeVries Decision Regarding Bare Metal Defense in Asbestos Litigation Primarily Limited to Maritime Cases | Maron Marvel Bradley Anderson & Tardy LLC

Three years and one pandemic after the U.S. Supreme Court provided guidance in March 2019 on the bare metal defense in asbestos litigation commonly known as “DeVries,” the bare metal.

United statesJeffreyj clarkSheldonk renniealsoheldBabb incJohn crane incUs district courtGeorgia courtSupreme courtArmstrong intl incMcdermott incUs supreme courtTennessee supreme courtCourt rulings since devriesBare metal defense under maritime lawTennessee products liability actEquipment defendants

Tennessee Supreme Court Implicitly Adopts The

The Tennessee Supreme Court s opinion in Carolyn Coffman et al v. Armstrong International, Inc., et al., at least implicitly, recognized a bare metal defense for the first time under Tennessee law. The Court addressed the issue of whether, under Tennessee law, equipment defendants had a duty to warn of the dangers associated with the post-sale integration of asbestos-containing materials manufactured and sold by others. The Court held that, under the Tennessee Products Liability Act (TPLA), Tenn. Code Ann. §29-28-101 through 108, the equipment defendants did not have a duty to warn end users about the post-sale incorporation of asbestos containing products

United statesDonald coffmanCarolyn coffmanTennessee courtSupreme courtArmstrong international incTennessee supreme courtSupreme court rulingTennessee products liability actTennessee eastmanEquipment defendantsTennessee supreme court implicitly adopts the quot bare metal defenseEdiation amp arbitrationTrials amp appeals compensationஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில்டொனால்ட் காஃப்மேன்