Caption content and accuracy. Visit ncicap. Org] [captions Copyright National cable satellite corp. 2019] about 20 minutes left in this discussion. A reminder, you can find it online at cspan. Org wj. The house gaveling back in. We take you now to the floor. He house will resume proceedings on postponed questions at a later time. The hat purpose does gentleman from california seek recognition . Mr. Takano madam speaker, i suspend the house rules and pass h. R. 4920. The speaker pro tempore the clerk will report the title of the bill. The clerk h. R. 4920, a bill to amentitle 38, United States an , to provide for exception to certain Small Business contracting equirements applicable to the department of Veterans Affairs procurement of certain goods and Services Covered under the Ability One Program, and for other purposes. The speaker pro tempe pursuant to the rule, the california, mr. Takano, and the gentleman from will each bost, control 20 minutes. The chair recognizes the gentleman
Reauthorizing the freedom act of 2015. Two panels, basically for parts of the act. Im of the panels to tell us the good, the bad, the ugly, why we need these four tools, why we need to reauthorize the program in your view, what happens if we dont, would you accept any changes . What with those changes be . Im very interested in hearing from the National Security perspective how the usa freedom act of 2015 is still relevant in 2019 and beyond, and the tools available to Law Enforcement and Intelligence Community provided by this act, how they are relevant to the fight we are still in, baghdadi is dead, but the cause lives or the effort to penetrate our countrys ongoing every day. Terrorist groups of different names are trying to come here to do us harm and to americans abroad. The war is far from over. No air force to shoot down, no navy to sink, no capital to conquer. This is an ideology that must be combated and those that embrace this ideology embrace death. The only way you protect
Decision on internet regulation. Also known as Net Neutrality. Joining us to discuss this issue, gigi sohn who served as Senior Advisor to fcc chair tom wheeler for several years, and is going with the Georgetown Law Institute for technology. And Patrick Holly was Senior Vice President at u. S. Telecom, a trade association here in washington, d. C. Before we put on our advocates at, give us a lawyers assessment of what the d. C. Court of appeals ruled. Guest what the d. C. Court of appeals ruled was that the fcc decision and the restoring of the net freedom order was permissible and essentially completely upheld. Its a big win for consumers, a big win for innovators, big win for investment in broadband in america. Essentially what the court said was that the fcc decision to regulate broadband and Internet Access as an Information Service as a module has been for the last 20 years outside of a two years under the title ii order was permissible. Its consistent with Supreme Court preceden
We continue our look at rapid city with a visit to bear butte, a place considered sacred by numerous native americans in the region. Im donovin sprague. High backbone, from the hump and crazyhorse families of the minocoshu for my tribal affiliation from Sheyenne River sioux reservation which is about 100 miles east of where i stand right now at the sacred bear butte. A very spiritual place where people of Many American Indian Tribes and nationalities visit. People come here and theyll give tobacco offering and prayers so theyll leave those like often with tobacco and cloth and for maybe a loved one or something that theyre praying for, but it just shows the all the prayers that are left here and that are well well received in this very area that were at. Ive actually given some names to some people here. So some of these places when i just look over, i can kind of almost imagine us, you know, having our little ceremony and get together and somebody, on great occasion, somebody getting
Fccs decision and the restoring Internet Freedom order was permissible and was, essentially, completely upheld. Its a big win for consumers, its a big win for innovators, big win for investment in broadband in america. And essentially e what the court said was that the fccs decision to regulate Broadband Internet access as an Information Service, as it largely has been for the last 20 years outside of a twoyear period under the title ii order, was permissible. Its consistent with Supreme Court precedent, and this d. C. Circuit was not going to make a determination that the fccs crassification classification was incorrect. Because its within their discretion as the Expert Agency to classify broadband as an Information Service or as a telecommunication service. What it did also say was that the commission and the one area where the commissions decision was vacated, which doesnt come up until page 121 of the report. Everything up to that point was upheld. That, look, the fcc, you dont hav