Good morning, friday, april 6th. Fox friends. Brian day 8 of the donald trump trial. Set to meet Behind Closed Doors on president ial immunity. President biden says is he not following the cases. Lawrence unbelievable. Wild video migrants getting on The Beast Mexico heading to the u. S. Border. Incredible rescue two Barber Barberrers Saved that little girl about to run into traffic and possible be hit by a car. Those everyday heros are going to join us this hour. The second hour of fox friends starts right now and, remember, especially on fridays, mornings are better with friends. Oh, yeah. Guy a Fox Weather Alert right now parts of nebraska under a tornado warning. Americas heartland is expected to see dangerous storms throughout the day. Ainsley this comes one day after several land spouts and hail hit colorado and kansas yesterday. Brian those are samples. Lets go straight to Senior Meteorologist janice dean for our fox weather forecast. Janice . Janice video is showing where we cou
Not so fun. Hours from now, former President Trump will be sitting in a manhattan courtroom as his Hush Money Trial is set to resume. This as the judge overseeing the case has yet to rule if trump violated his gag order. In washington, d. C. , the Supreme Court will hear Oral Arguments over trumps claim that he is immune from criminal prosecution in the d. C. Election interference case. Plus, arizonas Attorney General has charged mark meadows, rudy giuliani, and other key trump allies, as well as 11 socalled Fake Electors with state crimes after they attempted to keep trump in power following the 2020 election. I dont know. Did you see that coming . I did not. I didnt see that coming. I really didnt. Good morning. Welcome to morning joe. Willie, did you see that coming . Not this one. I mean, we suspected it was coming sometime, but didnt see it coming yesterday. And some boldfaced names apparently among the group of aides to donald trump. Giuliani, meadows, eastman. Yeah. Apparently a
the way their state will op buy-in. people don t get to vote on what is constitutional. that is what the court is for. that is the point. there are people in the south said it was perfectly fine for segregation. that is not it didn t make segregation unconstitutional. or illegal to be interracial marriage. should this be a constitutional issue or democratic issue at the state? clearly, ted oleson thinks it s constitutional issue. clearly, the other side thinks it is not. i think ted olson is much more adroit to make the argument about the institution of marriage as something that justice kagan asked at one point what is the harm if this goes through? we have the effect of same-sex marriage. eventually the court has to decide. even if they don t decide this time they have to make the decision. i have the feeling, i may be wrong about this, but i keep thinking in a sneaky way justice roberts will try to figure out a way to rule on
this so he is able to be a part of a court that moves forward on something he has to face if not now, five years from now, ten years from now. john: what about the idea brought up at the court that we are too early in to this to be able to make any learned decision at the court level? alito talked about this issue newer than the internet, newer than cell phones. it s something that really, should they be taking this on or let it sort of i think justice kagan said perk at the state level for a while before they decide whether or not to weigh in. don t forget if you look at poll numbers, more and more people support gay marriage; particularly, young people. the trend is eventually more people will be voting to support this. should the supreme court interfere or let the states work it out? john: leave it there. coming up next, we talk about the crazy spending by the federal government. don t go away. a growing majority of americans have come to believe it s time to allow marriage
technicalities involved today. each of the lawyers addressing the court had to go through it today. john: what is your sense of this? does the court have standing here? i don t think they made that decision yesterday. they are trying to figure out with whether or not this plaintiff should be before the court. first, what is the injury to them? they are asking about that. they are trying to figure out if the court ruled narrowly on appeal to be brought to that level. they may never get to the merits of the case. as your reporter said in the report earlier in the show which means we will never get to broader argument of supreme court taking up gay marriage. it suspect listening to the audio. it sounds like they are looking for a way to avoid ruling broadly. that is what the general consensus is right now. that is right. they seem to not rule on this to say, justice kennedy saying why do we have this case? which will be a major disappointment to everyone involved. on both sides. peo