this so he is able to be a part of a court that moves forward on something he has to face if not now, five years from now, ten years from now. john: what about the idea brought up at the court that we are too early in to this to be able to make any learned decision at the court level? alito talked about this issue newer than the internet, newer than cell phones. it s something that really, should they be taking this on or let it sort of i think justice kagan said perk at the state level for a while before they decide whether or not to weigh in. don t forget if you look at poll numbers, more and more people support gay marriage; particularly, young people. the trend is eventually more people will be voting to support this. should the supreme court interfere or let the states work it out? john: leave it there. coming up next, we talk about the crazy spending by the federal government. don t go away. a growing majority of americans have come to believe it s time to allow marriage
second amendment problems. the treaty calls for government to create list of weapons. opponents charge it would create a nationwide gun registry. the national rifle association has lobbied against the treaty. calling at it violation of americans gun rights. but the treaty supporters say it s not so. this is about the international arms transfers. it will be have no impact, zero impact on domestic issues within the u.s. here. zero impact on second amendment rights. very clear. this treaty is about the international transfer of arms and ammunition around the world. critics predict any u.n. declaration cannot stop the international flow of illegal weapons. at best, this treaty will achieve nothing whatsoever. it will be just a worthless piece of paper. if the treaty is approved in the u.n., possibly this week, it must be ratified by two-third of the u.s. senate. that is unlikely.