Stay updated with breaking news from Tabling motion. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Out the door. I think one of the key votes i would look for going up on the board early on is andy biggs. Andy biggs, not only has i think a reasonable mind, i think he can step back from this. He will also be very influential on others. As goes biggs, i think a number of them will also go. I really do. And for, you know, Matt Rosendale has to look people in the mirror and say you are criticizing the speaker for working with democrats but you are the one that will be voting with the democrats today. So john yeah, an interesting point to make. We wont have to wait long when the roll is called to find out how biggs voted, at least his name is not zimmerman. Might have to wait a long time if it were. Jason, good to see you. Thanks so much. Really appreciate it. Thank you. John at this hour, House SpeakerKevin Mccarthy fight ....
President should be subject to impeachment inquiry. i will say this the position many members took was more nuanced than many think. many of the member like me supporting impeachment inquiry did not vote with did not oppose the tabling motion, because they didn t like this particular approach. and i sort of share that. i think what mr. green. meaning you don t like the going ahead with impeachment for ra racism as the reason. my feeling was this should have been referred to the judiciary committee rather than tabled. but i share the view that many colleagues share that this is not the approach that we should take. i don t think one member using the privileges of the house should impose a set of impeachment articles on everyone else and ask for yes or no vote. having said that, with we don t get to vote with footnotes. we have to vote yes or no, red or green. ....
motes. 22 republicans voted against it and all of the democrats. just before the vote, speaker boehner blamed president obama at the talks aimed at a bipartisan deal. i stuck my neck out a mile and i put revenues on the table. in order to try to come to an agreement to avert us being where we are. but a lot of people in this town can never say yes. a lot of people can never say yes. this house has acted and it is time for the administration and time for our colleagues across the aisle, put something on the table. tell us where you are. here is the thing. the conservatives resulted in a bill that has no pass of passing and no chance of a cigsignature from a democratic president. it holds our economy captive to washington politics once again. in other words, it does not solve the problem and has no chance of becoming a law. here is why he rejects it. it would force spending cults immediately. but to get increase in the debt ceiling, the house and the senate would ....
Others have begun to constitutional option, that each senate, even congress can create its own rules, and when it does that, it s by majority vote, and if it s by majority vote, that means you can destroy the filibuster or do other things through a majority vote. not to get too technical. if that was tried, there would be a moment where the republicans would raise an objection, in effect, to proceeding to that, and then the democrats would have to basically move to table the objection, and that s what they can do. the tabling motion would only need 50 votes, but we ve never seen this move before, have we? is this a senate floor move that s never happened, because i don t have any memory of anything like that happening. my understanding is it has happened, and i don t want to go too deep into this because i didn t bone up on it, but my understand issing three or four times before there have been rule changes made under this rule. that, in fact, mondale and others in fact, the 55 v ....
Call the constitutional option. that each senate, each congress can create its own rules. and when it s by majority vote, and if it s by majority vote, that means you can destroy the filibuster or do other things through a majority vote. not to get too technical. if that was tried, there would be a moment where the republicans would raise an objection, in effect, to proceeding to that, and then the democrats would have to basically move to table the objection, and that s what they can do. the tabling motion would only need 50 votes, but we ve never seen this move before, have we? is this a senate floor move that s never happened, because i don t have any memory of anything like that happening. my understanding is it has happened, and i don t want to go too deep into this because i didn t bone up on it, but my understanding is three or four times before, there have been rule changes made under this rule. that, in fact, mondale and others in fact, the 55 vote filibuster, bring it d ....