had a few minutes with the report. andrew, let me get your first reactions to anything that has leapt out at you, if anything. recognizing that you ve only had a few minutes, i m gonna give you more time to read, this but this is just your first headline reaction to it. yeah no i see dan and i are doing the same thing. we are trying to do two things at the same time. this is a monumental, or as you said, it is over 800 pages and there are four appendices that look fascinating, addressing such minor issues as the preparation of law enforcement to meet the challenges of january 6th and whether there was foreign interference in the 2020 election there were these appendices, and they re trying to take the entire report. and then the table of contents is really, to me, attracts what i think is the genius of the january six committee. which is really focusing on all of the different ways that the former president tried to stay in office. as opposed to just thinking about january
stephen passantino should be disbarred if that testimony is believed. and should be convicted of perjury. if that testimony is to be believed. cassidy hutchison goes there and i said, if i do remember things. but not every little detail that i said. wouldn t i be purging myself? and he had said, stephen had said something effective. the committee doesn t know what you can and can t recall. so you want to be able to use that as much as we can, unless you really really remember something here. and that is where you give a short, sweet response. the correct answer to that question. if i do remember things, but not every little detail wouldn t i be purging myself? the correct answer to that question is yes. you would be perjuring yourself. stephen passantino lied to his client about that.
wouldn t i be perjuring myself? and he had said, stephen had said something effective. the committee doesn t know what you can and can t recall. so you want to be able to use that as much as we can, unless you really really remember something clearly. and that is where you give a short, sweet response. the correct answer to that question. if i do remember things, but not every little detail wouldn t i be perjuring myself? the correct answer to that question is yes. you would be perjuring yourself. stefan passantino lied to his client about that. if cassidy hutchinson s testimony. if cassidy hutchinson who had never and cannot afford a lawyer. had been offered this free lawyer from what she called it cassidy hutchinson s the mid to remain under the control of that they are paid by donald trump. she would have of the testimony.
on page 36, cassidy hutchinson says, i said, but if i do recall something but not every little detail, stefan, can i still say i don t recall, and he had said yes. for that one word, yes, stefan passantino should be disbarred if that testimony is believed and should be convicted of suborning perjury if that testimony is believed. cassidy hutchinson goes on and i said, but if i do remember things, but not every little detail and i say i don t recall, wouldn t i be perjurying myself and he had said, stefan had said something to the effect of the committee doesn t know what you can and can t recall so we want to be able to use that as much as we can unless you really, really remember something very clearly and that s when you give a short, sweet response. the correct answer to that
0 at the justice department s ability to compel their testimony. it is highly sensitive to go after information from a sitting member of congress. but they re not being targeted because their members of congress. they re being targeted because of the conduct, the conversations with donald trump on january 6th. so, i don t see how you investigate this case without talking to them. and maybe their witnesses, maybe their defendants. we ll see how that shakes out. charlie, before we. go just a big picture question. the degree to which generally six committee exceeded expectations and the degree to which there added in terms of the information landscape around january 6th. how much they actually changed? for broader swap the american public. let s hear assessment there. i think they did a good job. they surprise a lot of people who thought they already know this stuff. the video was on tv for all to see. the media reconstruction the events that day. so trump was openly urging those peop