Live Breaking News & Updates on Supreme Court No Question|Page 2
Stay updated with breaking news from Supreme court no question. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Agents can access them. thousands. they re basically provided to local laufts. agents throughout the country can access them. can thousands take them out? no the ability to take out or remove would be extraordinary. if anybody actually i assume it s on a computer database if anybody actually accessed them and tried to print them up or something i would imagine there is a record. there is a record no question there is a record. remember these are just suspicious activity reports. doesn t mean there is a crime. any time there is a transaction over $10,000 or anything unusual for an account these things get flagged. everybody thanks very much. coming up next, a talk with the former director of national intelligence james clapper who testified before the senate intelligence committee today. it s time for sleep number s semi-annual sale . the dual adjustability of the sleep number bed ....
A gigantic leap to decide to put personal banking information in the national news. um-hum. what will happen to him do you think. i mean, it is a criminal it s always a criminal to leak a suspicious activity report. so i suspect that there will be an investigation at a minimum the inspector general is already investigating but it s a serious question. i mean michael cohen is the subject of a criminal investigation. but none of this should be public. you know, if you put aside i m not going to defend someone leaking something that one of the possibilities you mentioned is this was taken and put aside for the special prosecutor, the other possibility is very alarming. now you are getting into the nixonian era where potentially someone is using the levers of power to obstruct justice. that s why this is it s an interesting story now. we need to know which one it is. we don t know now. because you go from whistle blower leaker to whistle blower. and it s a whistle blowe ....
And i trust the legal opinion here that mueller is not in you know, is not in a place to test it. but it doesn t mean anything about the case he has put together. sfr a legal standpoint how do you see it. it s a open question we said this time and time again whether a subpoena can be effected upon the president in a criminal matter. we have seen it in a civil matter. but it s never been tested in a criminal matter. and you know, there has been there have been subpoenas issued as it relates to dualities but not for verbal testimony. so that s an open question. if the president doesn t agree to be interviewed does the lawyer say look we re not providing him for brf then it opens the door to subpoena. at that point in time that s something that will probably go to the supreme court no question. you know, i got to tell you what i take away from this is what i said now for months, the president should take this and the team should take it as a signal that it s time to start work ....
Though there is that historical standard it has never been tested. it has never been brought before any court, obviously, it ultimately would end up getting to the supreme court because no justice department tried to diet a sitting president. it was an open question whether or not mueller would actually be the first to challenge it. if he felt he had enough incriminating evidence against the president that he would do that. we don t know the answer to that question whether he has incriminating evidence. but at least according to rudy giuliani, the mueller team has told him you know, we re going to adhere to the press den and not going to going are go forward in any way shape or form with an indictment if it comes to that. but to be clear this is what rudy giuliani said. exactly. was heard by someone on the mueller team not mueller himself, correct. he wasn t clear as to whether it was mueller himself or not. butway we also know from gloria borger talked to another source ....
no the ability to take out or remove would be extraordinary. if anybody actually i assume it s on a computer database if anybody actually accessed them and tried to print them up or something i would imagine there is a record. there is a record no question there is a record. remember these are just suspicious activity reports. doesn t mean there is a crime. any time there is a transaction over $10,000 or anything unusual for an account these things get flagged. everybody thanks very much. coming up next, a talk with the former director of national intelligence james clapper who testified before the senate intelligence committee today. ....