Francisco variable again. The key element missing is transit its not in the drawing. When you look at the sfmtas overhead one more time. Thank you transit in the next 25 years there are lovely diagrams but they ignore the sunset area if all the money is going downtown whats happening the transit in other areas and one last one they talked about the february 4th accounting meeting will estimated transit trips to motorbike our quality of life. In order to correct this youve got to get the trains and the car traffic flipped in the amount of uncle and thats only by solving it through mass transit. And it has to be taken in the next 5 years. So thank you thank you is there any further Public Comment. Are there any other items for us no item 10 adjournment. Thank you everyone else for this meeting today. Meeting welcome to the San Francisco Historic Preservation Commission Regular meeting. For wednesday, february 5, 2014. Please be aware that the commission did not trotter any disruptions an
Address the public with respect to jound agenda items your opportunity when be afforded when the item is reached in the meeting. Each member of the public may address the commission up to 3 minutes. I have one speaker card Richard Rothman, please. Good afternoon, commissioners im Richard Rothman im back here again talking about the building at the zoo. They opened the childrens playground there so the building is now assessable and hopeful that that will be opened up and the next thing the recreation and Parks Department put in a grant for the Historic Preservation commission for the rec and park and the zoo society to do a study to see how much it would cost could renovate the building and i would hope this commission would ask the staff to send a letter of support to the Historic Preservation Commission Fund committee in support of this application. And i still building this building down the road is not a city landmark and should be a city landmark. If people want to know more about
Im calling courtney so i think were going to do a catch up. Particularly as we unrainfall the difference not so much as the expanded medical but it reminds me of a time many years ago we used to fund a program called aids counselors. We maybey inviting it in the future. So on to recommendation number 6. Again as courtney mentioned at state level and we participate in the activities that are happening with the state. The state has dedicated a person Ryan White Fund called part b funds they have the person tell caffeine into our meeting and hopeful that will he help us get mostly updates which prier intents funding. Can i request ask you a quick question. Is there a requirement that all providers receive that assistants assistance we offer a number of different kinds of training everything from cult competence and were adding this. We dont necessarily require it but people are separate for the information. People are knocking on our doors what does this mean and in terms of recommendatio
Jackie and thank you very much, commissioners, for your sustained interest in this item as of such a long afternoon. Pending your approval to award the lease to the Bay Institute Aquarium Foundation i hope to return on your next meeting february 25 to request authorization to execute the lease. And that concludes my presentation. Thank you. So moved. Second. Public comment . Let the record reflect that several members of the audience are giving a thumbs up. Thank you. Commissioners, comments . I just think that we are extremely pleased to see the results since the last Commission Meeting that we discussed this and want to commend all the parties and you heard us and just the fact that we dont have 40 speaker cards today is an amazing accomplishment. Thank you very much. I would like to say congratulations and thank you. Its great that you have been able to form your collaborative and it seems like you have really thought it out really well to find out everyones strengths and weaknesses
Issues, or whatever, then it probably isnt extraordinary. But there seem to be other circumstances that were always faced with. So, on the one hand, i think as a bedroom, since its off the bedroom and if we assume that the project sponsor is going to live there for quite a long period of time and hes old enough that hes not going to grow very much taller, hes, you know, the five foot setback would probably work. I dont know which lady in the back is your wife, but i assume shes not any taller than you are. So, from one standpoint you could argue that five feet might work in this case and still have enough livability on the deck. And i suppose and i dont know where to go with it exactly, but one idea might be to have although you may not want to go to the extent of spending the money for it, but you could have the roof deck as a deck and only pull the railing back five feet. And then at some future date and im trying to be sensitive here. At some future date, either the if this owner le