comparemela.com

Latest Breaking News On - Sudershan kumar bhayana - Page 1 : comparemela.com

Annual Digest of Arbitration Cases : 2023 (Part -II)

Supreme Court Will The Mandate Of The Tribunal Terminate Under Section 29A Unless Extended During Its Subsistence? Supreme Court To Examine The Supreme Court is set to examine an important.

State of uttar pradeshUttar pradeshTamil naduAndhra pradeshIndia generalUnited statesHong kongJammu and kashmirWest bengalState of west bengalJalpaiguri districtState of uttarakhandHimachal pradeshPurushaindra kumar kauravDharmesh sharmaJustice jaspreet singh

Proof of loss incurred necessary to claim damages under contractual entitlement

The article discusses the need to show proof of loss incurred due to a breach of contract to claim damages under a penalty clause, along with an analysis of a case on this topic that came up before the Delhi High Court.

Vinod sethSudershan kumar bhayanaHigh courtDelhi high courtConciliation actCollaboration agreementArbitral tribunalContract lawProof of loss sufferedIndian contract actSec 73 contract actSec 74 contract actFateh chandv balkishan dasMaula buxv union of indiaOil amp natural gas corporation limitedv saw pipes limitedKailash nath associatesv delhi development authority amp anr

Delhi High Court Monthly Digest: October 2023 [Citations 917

Citations 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 917 to 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1039NOMINAL INDEXPCIT Versus Pepsico India Holding Pvt. Ltd. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 917 ADITYA N PRASAD v. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. 2023.

Uttar pradeshIndia generalNew delhiSanjeev sachdevaJustice saurabh banerjeeJustice swarana kanta sharmaRaghav chadhaJustice anoop kumar mendirattaAbhishek singhNeena raizadaJustice suresh kumar kaitJustice vikas mahajanJustice manoj jainJustice prathibam singhNaresh sharmaJusticec hari shankar

Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: October 02 To October 08, 2023

Citations 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 917 to 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 933NOMINAL INDEX PCIT Versus Pepsico India Holding Pvt. Ltd. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 917 ADITYA N PRASAD v. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. 2023.

Tamil naduDistrict parkNew south walesJustice neena bansal krishnaAbhishek singhJustice rajiv shakdherSudershan kumar bhayanaJustice vibhu bakhruHarshita gandhiJusticec hari shankarAmit mahajanJustice satish chandra sharmaJustice subramonium prasadShelly oberoiVibhu bakhruJustice girish kathpalia

Award On Damages Cannot Be Sustained Just On Penalty Clause In Agreement: Delhi High Court

The High Court of Delhi has held that an award of damages based on no evidence of loss cannot be sustained on the basis of a penalty clause in the agreement. The bench of Justices Vibhu Bakhru .

Vibhu bakhruAmit mahajanSudershan kumar bhayanaJustices vibhu bakhruCollaboration agreementDelhi high court liquidated damages penalty clause

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.