Alleged coconspirators in that indictment. Charles burnham, defense attorney for coconspirator number 2 from the recent indictment. This is a person who has been confirmed and identified as john eastman, the lawyer, who advised donald trump, who spoke at the January 6th Rally there next to rudy giuliani, and was a key architect of much of what the president and his aides were trying to push heading into the january 6th certification. Charles, first of all, thank you very much for making the time and joining me tonight. Thank you for having me. Absolutely. We put aside some time for this. I want to start with a couple of quick things and then get into the case. But first and foremost, donald trump lost the 2020 election. You accept that fact . Well, look. There is a large portion of the country that has issues with the 2020 election. There are still discussion about things that went on. A large portion of the country believes in goats or horoscopes. Im asking do you accept the results o
rnc meeting which shows the maga elitism problem the party faces. this is behind the closed doors. the r fl rnc meeting has a behind the doors closed meeting. this is a departure from the past. you can see how it used to look in the old days. take haley barbour, 94 rnc chair or michael steele who so many people know from the similar meeting they held when he was chair to the closed press secret meetings. this is a file photo that shows the contrast over the years, the tightening secrecy. why is it a secret? the rnc is clearly trying to duck any further pressure, scrutiny or efficacy to end the employ primaries which would have tried to declare the primaries over and trump the nominee. the rnc said haley should drop out, trump has to be the winner. this morning nikki haley did something unusual, something trump hasn t done, which is face questions from a different and more adversarial set of interviewers. she went, just like biden has, to the breakfast club and took the que
bringing you on, is mr. tacopina who has been on this program and others, you know, with diplomatic language, they have all but said in more than one forum, we re trying, we have a challenging client. and that doesn t mean he s guilty or not, as you said, he may say things that complicate the case and the process may find that he went over the line and threatened someone in the way that s indictable, but they all but said that. they re also saying tonight, and i mentioned a new filing, that the protective order which is kind of a subset issue, like before we get to the trial, how you deal with the evidence, really tramples what they call the first amendment rights of someone who is also a public figure and candidates. they say, quote, in a trial about first amendment rights, government, that s jack smith, seeks to restrict first amendment rights. worse, it does so against its administrations, that s bringing up jack smith he s part of
religious freedom, a key talking point of republicans over the course of the political season. great point. you are looking at the religious exemptions which the obama administration said they provide to give people following federal laws in this case health care regulation the ability to not have to do things or even fund things that they disagree with. the abortion area one of the test cases. that will not address the functioning of obamacare as folks will remember the court upheld that the program is lawful and constitutional. this looks at that subset issue of whether there are enough ways that religious folks practice their faith while complying with the law. the administration said the exemptions are big and ample enough. nice of you to give the yogi berra on this day. you bet. thank you very much. thank you. the death toll up to nine in that historic east coast flooding. the probables, they re far from
resolved. evan, we debate immigration a lot in this country. looking at the numbers on the subset issue of refugees, the u.s. spent about a billion dollars in 2014. not a lot of money from a federal budget tear level scale. john kerry talking that s 70,000 and that s 15,000 per. john kerry talking about taking in more, the president taking in a doll lop more. do you think that s enough? it s important to contribute here. a lot of us armchair quarterbacking and criticizing european countries for their reluctance to take in refugees or their poor treatment of refugees. and i think it is a collective responsibility. we have decided that we have launch add military campaign in iraq and syria. this is an area that we have committed to for years. we ve committed military forces. i think we have to commit humanitarian resources. the numbers, it is difficult to say. obviously, thes a touchy issue with immigration being such a