states that we have the intelligence to prevent this from happening. that falls right in line with the findings of this committee, and their report and our report, the subcommittee report, never was there a question by the folks on the ground that this was not a terrorist attack. they knew it was a terrorist attack. they never questioned it, there was recently a letter sent to the president by senator mccain, senator graham. they re asking the question of the president based on the inconsistencies that we see go through our investigation and the senate intelligence committee. get the story straight. right. my question to you is, as someone who has investigated this, do we already know the answer how the business about the protest and video got injected into the story. i m looking at the talking points that were reportedly given by the cia to those involved. and the very first bullet point from our intel community is, we
now where they are starting to make some headway in the three big fires that are burning there, the biggest of them called the crown fire has burned some 15,000 plus acres. 30,000 acres have been burned all together in the three fires, but authorities say that 82% of that big fire, the crown fire, now has been contained. some new documents we were just talking about this, new documents released by a congressional subcommittee seemed to indicate that the ghost card allowed bp to use excessive amounts of chemical dispersants in the gulf of mexico. it s gotten a lot of attention, we ve been talking about it for awhile. bp used the chemicals to break up oil after the april 20th deepwater horizon rig explosion sent millions of gallons of crude gushing into the gulf but despite a federal directive restricting their use the coast guard routinely granted exemptions this committee says. the house energy and environmental subcommittee report says the coast guard approved more than 74 exemption
there in the general public that, yeah, most of these guys, they don t play by the same rules. all right, but on the merits, mary. as you look at this, trying to make a judgment as a citizen and as a journalist, is it fair to put charlie rangel with these documents? i think it is, i think it s absolutely outrageous and you know, not just that he did one or two things wrong, but as the investigative subcommittee report says there s a pattern of inaccurate reporting not just on taxes, but his financial disclosure reports. this is obviously a politician, 21 terms in congress. 20 terms i think. this will be 21 if he s elected in november and thinks he s invincible. it s very clear, i mean, he thinks that he is above the law and i cannot see how we could just say, well, everybody does it. you know, let it pass, if we expect to have any accountability in congress. and business as usual? well, i don t know, i mean, it s how do we know whether it s
but i think there s a belief out there in the general public that, yeah, most of these guys, they don t play by the same rules. all right, but on the merits, mary. as you look at this, trying to make a judgment as a citizen and as a journalist, is it fair to put charlie rangel with these documents? i think it is, i think it s absolutely outrageous and you know, not just that he did one or two things wrong, but as the investigative subcommittee report says there s a pattern of inaccurate reporting not just on taxes, but his financial disclosure reports. this is obviously a politician, 21 terms in congress. 20 terms i think. this will be 21 if he s elected in november and thinks he s invincible. it s very clear, i mean, he thinks that he is above the law and i cannot see how we could just say, well, everybody does it. you know, let it pass, if we expect to have any accountability in congress. and business as usual? well, i don t know, i mean,
in the general public that yeah, most of these guys don t play by the same rules. but on the merits, mary, if you look at this, trying to make a judgment as a citizen and a journalist, is it fair to put charlie rangel on the can do for these allegations? oh, i think it is. i think it is absolutely outrageous and not that he did just one or two things wrong but as the investigative subcommittee report says there was a pattern of inaccurate reporting not just on his taxes but his financial disclosure reports and this is obviously a politician, 21 terms in congress 20 terms, i think. sorry, this will be 21 coming up in november and thinks he is invincible. it is very clear, he thinks he is above the law and i could not see how we could say everybody does it, let it pass if we expect to have any accountability in congress. dan, business as usual? well, i don t know. how do we know it is business as