laakersse funding for afterek o case. police mak an arrest in the murder of an ostudent. earning now secrets. employe inside jeffrey epstein s this dorna bat cape terrifying the moment aauhes ir into th o ly4th, 2 aouncer: from nbc 4 is toda with savannah guthrie and hoda kotb live rin welcome to paments a page s counsel it s the cyes of insthe forme director wasal i t investig inn 201 and caaign.eethe t 448 pacd version oe mseller ror to i april ofarhi he has made just one public statement, roughly nine minutes long since, and has not any that s ri8:30 this morning r getting a chancesons.ll appear his he s youaidwi bondt to testify.we re willoo takemor repor rmfospecial cnsel hind me and aof questions from lawmakers who will be seated right over here. for mocrs,e a up and all today ae. this mo orn for more wo yet, ansttime. iscision to muel tot to advising de won t answer questions hearit second whecc addingunir. should not be allowed. a rigged witch hu. t whole s
was at the society for historians of american foreign relations annual meeting in virginia. we spoke with professors and graduate students about research. this interview is about 20 minutes. steven scully: david hadley, a graduate and candidate at the university of columbus. let s talk about times like these. in researching this, what did you learn? david hadley: what i really learned is that the cia and the press have a at times riedentious and very va relationship between the two of them and it was really founded early on in this common understanding of cold war the of the united states is facing this new threat after world war ii in the soviet union. and there is, in the early days, there is a really strong sense that they had to work together in advance american interests. overtime that really declined. over time that really declined. starts as ans institution pushing back against the cia, that is when the cia got into trouble for the first time in the united states. st
that complications after he suffered a stroke. we are interested from hearing from those of you in the audience that are currently undecided about a presidential candidate. havent to hear what you not chosen one yet and we want to factor in monday s debate. did it help you? if you were an undecided voter, give us a call and let us know your thoughts this morning. 202-748-8000 for democrats. for republicans, 202-748-8001. independents, 202-748-8002. also, twitter and our facebook page. the website has a story that was posted by taking a look at undecided voters. if we extrapolate the share of undecided voters for the entire pool of registered voters in the u.s., it would imply there are 5.9 million undecided voters in the country. if we look at the slice of red voters that actually get out and vote, there are 3.8 million undecideds who will actually vote in this election. the share of undecided voters 4% andly goes between some of these undecided voters may be more undecided
cities across the country, exploring american history. a look at our visit to santa rosa, california. you re watching american history tv, all we can, every weekend on c-span3. we looked in the north. such a huge black cloud. it looked like smoke out of a train or something. we ran into the storm house because we thought it might be storming. we had to tie wet rags over our mouths just to keep from smothering. the old-timers said they had never seen nothing like that. our house was sealed, but that dust came through somehow. even the stucco houses. you had to mop real good when it was over. you just couldn t get it out no other way. lynn: today we will be looking at our dust bowl migration archives, which we have had since 1994 materials gathered beginning in 1974, primarily by gerald haslam. he received dozens of letters offering to provide him with material. he also gathered material directly from people who worked in the camps. charles todd and robert sunken are probab
minutes. steven scully: amanda demmer, who was a doctoral student at the university of new hampshire, a native of buffalo, new york. these andcusing on let me start with the benchmark of 1975, the fall of saigon. your recent picks up after that. amanda demmer: most histories your research fix up after that. amanda demmer: most research ends with the following saigon but my research begins with that moment and looks at the period often considered an epilogue, from the fall of saigon until bill clinton announced relationships normalizing. and the role of refugee issues in u.s. policy towards vietnam. steven scully: an interesting part is the normalized relations we now have. amanda demmer: yes. this is something that i think most americans are not familiar with. i know that relations with cuba were not normalized until very recently but after the war, policymakers extended the embargo that had formally been on the north to the entire country and also refused to extend formal