parties today finally getting a briefing on the classified documents found at the homes and offices of president biden, former president trump, former vice president pence. will they get the details they have been demanding on what secrets may have been exposed? the latest on rupert murdoch. a live report from kier simmons in crimea. many civilians will be caught in the middle. 2.4 million people live here. good day, everyone. i m andrea mitchell in washington where supreme court justices have been hearing arguments on two separate challenges to president biden s student loan forgiveness plan. the 26 million americans have applied for it. putting at risk a program potentially available for 40 million people. the program blocked late last year by a circuit court of appeals and a federal judge, would provide up to $20,000 in debt relief for borrowers earning less than $125,000 a year. at issue, whether the states have standing to appeal as well as the larger constitutio
you. dana: the supreme court now just moments away from handing down new rulings as we await decisions on several high-profile cases and welcome to a new hour of america s newsroom, i m dana perino and bill hemmer has the day off. great to be with you. aishah: i m aishah hosni. it is rare for the supreme court to issue decisions three days in a row but with 14 cases remaining on the docket opinions are set to be released today, tomorrow, and friday. and we actually won t know until tomorrow if more days might be added as well next week. here are some of the big cases we re waiting for. dana: everything from presidential immunity that could shape the future of u.s. politics to abortion and social media censorship. we have the legal team standing by and thank goodness for that. andy mccarthy and jonathan turley, waiting outside the court chief legal correspondent shannon bream. good morning, here we go. 14 cases left. everybody has immunity at the top of their list. w
ukraine receive compensation for damage caused by russia. here s what presidents biden and zelensky had to say after signing. and we have signed the strongest agreement between ukraine and us since our independence. and this is an agreement on security and thus, on the protection of human life. our goal is to strengthen ukraine s credible defence and deterrence capabilities for the long term. a lasting peace for ukraine must be underwritten by ukraine s own ability to defend itself now and to deter future aggression any time in the future. for reaction here in washington to the us ukraine agreement, i spoke to congressman gabe amo, a democrat from rhode island who serves on the house committee on foreign affairs. congressman, i want to start with the new security pact announced by the us and ukraine that s supposed to show the us s long term influence and also interest in ukraine. what do you make of this agreement? well, look, i think this is exactly the type of commitment t
it also states that washington will support kyiv in developing its military force through training, joint planning and cybersecurity efforts. additionally, the us will help ukraine receive compensation for damage caused by russia. here s what presidents biden and zelensky had to say after signing. and we have signed the strongest agreement between ukraine and us since our independence. and this is an agreement on security and thus, on the protection of human life. , ., ~ , life. our goal is to inaudible capabilities life. our goal is to inaudible capabilities for life. our goal is to inaudible capabilities for the life. our goal is to inaudiblel capabilities for the long-term. capabilities for the long term. a lasting capabilities for the long term. a lasting peace for ukraine that a lasting peace for ukraine that must be underwritten by ukraine s own ability to defend itself ukraine s own ability to defend itself now and to deter future aggression anytime in the f
concerns about the political significance of this case that the chief pointed to could be a reason for us to hold the line in terms of thinking about our standing doctrine and whether or not we should expand it in this area. if we look at our standing doctrine in cases like this, we find that even the most minor state interest, a dormant fund that hasn t been used by the state in 15 years, if that can be the basis for standing, i guess i m concerned that we re going to have a problem in terms of the federal government s ability to operate. harry, what are your takea takeaways? so, that was an elegant line of questioning. i have to put it in context. two basic issues in the first argument, where six republican attorneys general have sued.