Stay updated with breaking news from Spirit of the law. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
laura: well a blatantly false statement. here s the only thing non-lawyers need to know about this case. if after the 2020 election donald trump had announced that he was retiring from politics, alvin bragg would not have indicted him or if let s say after 2020 trump had gradually evolved in his views and maybe became more like romney or one of the bushes. in that case, alvin bragg would not have indicted him. the real reason that donald trump was booked and fingerprinted today comes down to one simple fact. he has the wrong political views. now, the entire class of politicians and media figures who cheered the proceedings today, donald trump represents an existential threat to the regime that s run our country into the ground for decades, a threat to the credibility of the media that he calls out relentlessly. but most significant of all another trump turn is a threat to the biden family and their nonstop grift machine. alvin bragg is more like alvin bag because he s ....
Why the fec didn t charge trump. watch this. on the federal level they said they declined. before they have written about it in a memo but they declined to prosecute, at first because he was president, and then, effectively because they had other things like the insurrection that they were trying to deal with. they never declined to prosecute because they didn t they didn t say that the law didn t apply to trump. laura: is that accurate? well, it s true that they didn t decline to prosecute because they didn t say well the law doesn t apply to trump. of course the law applies to trump. what they held was that the law was not violated at least not a majority on the commission to pursue that. again it goes back to the idea that not everything that might influence a campaign meets that statutory definition. in facts it s worse than that because it s actually illegal to spend your campaign funds for ....
Along with unpaid parking tickets. that s weissmann s conclusion here? really. what he said is a lot of gambled garbage. i have personal experience with him unfortunately and i hate to dig by any comment he makes the sick single most unethical prosecutor i ve ever dealt with in my life. what he said is meaningless. s been after donald trump for years and years trying to concoct a theory as he does with others. him and norm weisman have tried to figure out a way to get donald trump. it harkens back to jerry nadler who made the most irresponsible comment of a public official when he said we can t trust the e electric tours, we can t trust the voters to get rid of donald trump. that s what this is about. laura: sol, i have to get your response to the renowned legal mind at cnn, dana bash. we have to potentially differentiate the letter of the law and the spirit of the law. the actual case might be hard to ....
Records, and they conceal another crime but the indictment does not specifically say what those crimes were. we are assuming, perhaps, that they might be election related. i m wondering if you can specify what laws were broken. let me say as an initial matter the indictment doesn t speaks it because the law does not so require. laura: sol, the law does not require me to do that. is that an adequate response given the defendant here? it isn t an adequate response and as david pointed out, at a minimum there will be a bill of particulars so he will have to do take before too long as a due process matter. and i did see i did watch his whole press conference and i thought the whole press conference was pathetic. i ve been saying for quite a few days now, don t focus on the number of counts, focus on whether or not there s any real substance there. is this something that is ....