shannon: she was a pioneer in so many ways. you reference her time out west and where she was from and it was such an interesting back drop to see her become the first female appointed to the supreme court. she often told the story about graduating from stanford and not being able to get a job. no law firm would hire her as a woman in the 50s and 60s. she struggled to make it in the legal profession. to think she came out of school, she found a roadblock to any kind of legal career and she decided to plow forward and ends up on the supreme court. it is a really fascinating, truly american story. she went out and campaigned to become a judge because she saw this is my avenue. she didn t win the first election. she did ultimately end up becoming a judge but another part of her interesting background is she was a lawmaker in arizona in the state senate. so she had a real appreciation for all of the different branches, for fighting her way into the legal profession. she had a h
think. it s a really interesting thing because i think you are right. for the longest time, silicon valley didn t want to believe there was a problem. everybody likes disruption because it s easy. what they don t want is to bear the consequences of having done that. now that they are being called to task, what s really cool, i wrote this last weekend that brought ceos to me to start conversations for the first time. i m not worried about popularity. that s not what this is about. i m really worried about our children, and worried about the country, i m worried about democracy. i m worried about what goes on in the world. i just think that we don t want to be made more lonely. we don t want to be made more sad, we don t want to be made more unsuccessful. and wish for sure don t want that to happen to our kids. tucker: what you think the right way you are saying this is a very informed, unusually informed person on this questiot way to manage your children s use of these devices?
thing because i think you are right. for the longest time, silicon valley didn t want to believe there was a problem. everybody likes disruption because it s easy. what they don t want is to bear the consequences of having done that disruption. now that they are being called to task, what s really cool, i wrote last weekend that brought ceos to me to start conversations for the first time. i m not worried about popularity. that s not what this is about. i m really worried about our children, i m worried about the country, i m worried about democracy. i m worried about what goes on in the world. i just think that we don t want to be made more lonely. we don t want to be made more sad, we don t want to be made more unsuccessful. and we for sure don t want that to happen to our kids.t tucker: what do you think the right way you are saying thin as a very informed, unusually informed person on this question how is it the best way to manage your children s use of these devices? i thi
to believe that we have to believe the republicans, the grand old party is so up on their technology that they had firewalls in there and the democrats of silicon valley didn t. there s a broader question about the implications more broadly about this entire thing once people start pulling on the threads of where this investigation goes and what else happens to the possession of whoever pulled this off which appears to be the russian state actors. listen, we re hours away now from the electoral college coming together on monday. this needs protest, this needs people s voices. you can go to vigils for america. i think it s dot org. and they have a list of all the state protests at the state capitals this weekend and on monday. people need to have their voice heard. don t say to yourself, oh, what s the use? how do we nothing s going to happen. you don t know that. you don t know that. that s why we have to keep fighting. we have to fight all the way to inauguration day and then
talking about is they clearly have the goods on somebody there. why do you want to risk a president in the white house that could be blackmailed by whatever they discovered at the rnc? i will know the wall street journal is reporting today that perhaps they didn t get into the it s not clear. there s reporting today in the wall street journal that they didn t get into the rnc because of security measures. that said to believe that we have to believe the republicans, the grand old party is so up on their technology that they had firewalls in there and the democrats of silicon valley didn t. there s a broader question about the implications more broadly about this entire thing once people start pulling on the threads of where this investigation goes and what else happens to the possession of whoever pulled this off which appears to be the russian state actors. listen, we re hours away now from the electoral college coming together on monday. this needs protest, this needs