and flashing women, then it becomes clear to people. i have talked to more democratic female friends in new york city who are flabbergasted he continues to be covered as a serious candidate. what he s done not just to his wife and son but all these women who were willing participants in sexting, sex conversations oh, stop that. don t pretend. he makes a mockery out of his entire orientation as an online flasher. he makes light of it. says that s in my past. has nothing to do with me. character is essential. it s no one s job to sit in judgment of someone s personal s life but he did this on the job. he did this after he resigned, after he confessed to his wife, after they went to therapy, while doing interviews about how much he changed his life. so who thinks this is the only sexting episode that will become
reporter: one of the women who engaged in sex conversations with wiener told gossip web site radar online that the congressman may have been using those official resources for those unofficial communications. quoting: reporter: now, that would seem to constitute a misuse of an official resource. but also wiener s interviews last wednesday with many networks including this one, all weiner s interviews all in furtherance of what he has admitted is a lie could also be a misuse of resources.
pretty specific about what constitutes a violation. they re spelled out and written out. what about in this case, based on what we now know? reporter: bill there, are key passages in the house ethics committee manual which could come into play here. read this one, for example. it says anything supported with official funds is an official resource, including congressional offices. now, listen to what nanc agree broussard, one of the women who engaged in sex conversations with weiner has said, she told radar magazine i gave him my number and he called me from otherwise office and we proceeded to talk dirty for a few minutes, a few days later i tried to call him back but the number wouldn t connect, saying it was a recorded message that, it was an outgoing congress line, only. that would seem to constitute a misuse of an official resource but there s speculation that weiner s interviews last wednesday with many networks, including this one, all in furtherance of what he admitted was a l
designed to save lives. like the trans fat ban already in effect. but they said salt is not the problem, just the excess of it. maybe like government, you would be worse off without it, and not that happy if it didn t work. i m not sure if that makes sense. you get the point. a top chef not happy about the salt proposal. he says, anybody who wants to taste food with a no-salt taste, go to a hospital and taste that. peter, i m not sure how much salt conversations rate. i m sure they don t rate as well as sex conversations, i can tell you that. where do you draw the line for politicians and food? no, i don t see this makes any sense. maybe you could make an argument it s good to have more transparency. it s probably a good thing at mcdonald s they tell you how many there are 9,000 calories in a hamburger or something like that. so maybe, maybe you could have something in restaurants equivalent with that transparency, about what they use. but to ban it seems to be crazy.