Live Breaking News & Updates on Services Consultant|Page 5
Stay updated with breaking news from Services consultant. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
The city directive. Would you care to amend it. Deny the appeal i uphold the denial appeal open the basis that the Property Owner was in violation and in violation yeah. What was the last part in violation of the city. Directives. Okay. So thats commissioner hondas motion to uphold the denial of this permit application on the basis that the appellant was in violation of city directives on that motion to uphold the denial commissioner fung commissioner hurtado and the president is absent the vote is 3 to zero this denial t is upheld thank you okay. So item 12 continued to november 5th and the next appeal don and andy vs. The Zoning Administrator the property on 1957 the issuance of 2014 regarding whether or not a deck by an inclusive used to be divided equally between two appellants appellants are not here is there anyone here for the beach street appeal okay no one here ....
Minimum requirements if were looking at the high noncompliance rates of utilities, the problems with 56rdability, the problems with small customer bases that just some great emphasis needs to be paid to providing more funding for these disadvantaged and smaller communities. My home state of texas has a lot of money theyre putting into water problems as a result of droughts. Californias done the same thing. Each state runs it different. A lot of states put extra money in. Some states dont. But i think its good. G. A. O. s done a terrific job at looking at some of these issues and i would encourage them to continue to do so. Thank you. My last question for mr. For mayor keegan mr. Newman and mr. Sellman, can you just given us briefly your success on the state resolving fund versus the r. U. S. , or do you access that . Why dont we go with mr. Keegan first . Sure. We havent had very much success. Weve had some limitations due to the average income of ow community. Weve been told its been ....
Treatment. That has to be against the law. It doesnt matter whether the employer knows it too absolute certainty. Absolutely. In that situation what is relevant is the employers intent. If the employer intends to discriminate on the basis of religion, that is a title vii violation. But whats going on here is that the employer seeks to apply a religion neutral dress code. It makes religious practice the refusal to accommodate religious practice is itself a violation. And that was done deliberately, was it not . So that religious practices would have to be accommodated. Yes, your honor. Two points in response. First we are not contending that religious practices do not have to be accommodated. But what we are contending is that an employer did not intentionally discriminate on the basis of a religious practice by enforcing a religion neutral dress code. What the statute does is to say that if you are wearing a headscarf for religious reasons, that the neutral policy really doesnt matter ....