Program, you went to court to fight for that. If this is such a problem, building 20 miles of wall, why not just go to court. We went to congress. Congress appropriates the funding, we asked them to not use the funding for that particular purpose they denied it and now we are complying with the law. If you have to build a border wall but you dont think its going to work, once its done are you going to tear it down . Im not getting into hypotheticals from here. Im just telling you what i can tell you from here, the facts are, that dhs is complying with the law. This is from fiscal year under fiscal year 2019, under Republican Leadership and dhs is required to do this. The president asked multiple times of congress to reappropriate, they did not. And we are not complying by the law. Thanks, everybody. Sandra clearly peter doocy getting questions at the end. If he had the chance, you know, she has obviously left the room. If the president continues to believe the border wall is not effect
This is not a Oneoff Payment to stormy daniels, but a scheme to prevent things being said. Karen mcdougal is expected to testify. A doorman apparently had information that turned out to be false about trumps love child. I think its damaging for the former president whos going to use the sergeant schultz defense, i know nothing. You look at how the prosecutors are going to paint a picture after the Access Hollywood Case comes out. I was covering him at that point. People were freaking out. They thought it was over for trump. They didnt want it to get any worse. I have one legal moment. Looking ahead later this week to thursday, theres a case with big implications in the supreme court. Theyll take up trumps immunity
everybody else. the attorney general wants the public to know about this stuff. wants the public to know about what tom just reported there. and so that we all know what they re doing. they re showing the work and giving a preview, as tom artfully said, of what is to come. and really, that filing left very little to the imagination. they ve clearly found soming st their own opinion. now the trump response will be, oh, come on, it s a little puffery, this is no big deal. much to do about nothing. and ultimately, whoever they depose will be the sergeant schultz defense. i see nothing, i hear nothing, that was somebody else. tom, really quickly, don jr. and ivanka called out in this, too. two of president trump s kids. right. one that either they oversaw the arrangement of these financial documents that were presented to financial institutions or
that sound you hear is the sound of the trump bus rolling over allen weisselberg at that rally. i do take it as admissions they re going to hurt allen weisselberg, the trump organization and could come back to be used against trump himself if he s ever charged in this matter. what you saw was a preview of his future defense, if he s ever charged, which is what i call the sergeant schultz defense, you remember the character, i know nothing he used to say. we see that defense all the time here when it comes to white collar broad cases. the defense could help trump but allen weisselberg can t use it, he has a level of sophistication, experience, knowledge, that makes that defense inapplicable. plus there s evidence of criminal intent here like the allegation of two separate sets of books one for the irs and one internally that kept account of the hidden benefits that
what can we expect from her testimony? kimberly: she s agreeing to come forward. what do you think, sara? i think the testimony is going to be behind closed doors to a large extent when it comes to the unmasking and kim wer berly, right now one of the big issues is most of those documents, in fact all of them are at the obama library so the only people that are actually seeing them are the people on the house intelligence committee that have the clearance to see them and what we know from lawmakers who have been briefed on it is greg is right, some of those unmasking requests had nothing to do with russia, had nothing to do with national security so she s going to have a lot of explaining to do, but whether the american public is going to get all those answers remains to be seen. kimberly: really, greg, it amounts to a political hacking and trying to interfere, it seems, and get information and spy for the purposes of the campaign. greg: it does, and her explanations are so upo