is that she could have had a different defense. i was very critical of the defense and the prosecution in the case. i didn t feel this was the strongest defense that was put on. remorse itself is not a factor, an element to this crime. but what you saw immediately after the shooting was shock. it was an officer that was in disbelief as to what occurred. that is relevant. i think the jury understood that it was not an intentional act. if it s not intentional, how can you say it was a conscious disregard of the home? that s what everyone gets stuck on. gillian: so what do you you think? if you re a judge in this case, how should you approach her sentencing here? i m not familiar with this judge s sentencing history. i think she s been a very fine judge in this trial. she s been really the gold standard. you do have someone that will be