It is the subject of a lot of discussion these days among china analyst. The book is called one child, the story of chinas most radical experiment. An amendment we will talk about why you chose the subject and how you went about answering the question that were on your mind. First i think would be helpful to define for people what it is were actually talking about. What is chinas one child policy question. Guest the one child policy is a bit of an it misnomer. It was used to describe a set of rules and restrictions that china has placed to regulate the population and the size of the family. Theoretically you could call it 1. 5 child for a long time. Now they they have moved it to a two child policy. It just means regulations. Host it is not one law and particularly but a basket of policies . When did did it happen and going to a effect . Guest 1980 when the communist party sent out an letter saying we are advising everybody to move to a one child family. It was advised but it was reall
Negative sentiment, this is a good reading. Sinces the highest october 2014. Into positive territory, and that means improving conditions or at least sentiment from the thousand purchasing managers at state owned enterprises. We are getting the nonmanufacturing pmi, Services Industries like construction, itecom, banking, 53. 5 here the previous month was 53. 9. We did not have a median estimate survey for that. ,till, this is pretty robust powering the new economy, also construction a big part of that, the property rebound in china feeding into that. From july, butck still historically a robust number. Let me dig into the previous month. 53. 5, sumner to june, 53. 7, so more stability on the Services Front and a robust number for ,he official manufacturing pmi 50. 4. Ther this hour, we will get pmi. We are also expecting a reading of 50. 1, mostly a survey of Smaller Enterprises in china. Can read from this is slightly improving conditions on the manufacturing front we will dig into th
I call the madison avenue you those. You had a time when it was more intuitive command was more principled. Principal and philosophical than what you see today. We see today is techno politics, and it operates on the right and left. It even gets down to people running for office filtering out in the formula voters that dont show up to the polls. You know what, i dont even want to count them because they are not going to have an impact. What i am saying is that you are making an excellent. There is a reality, and i am not defending it. But i am describing it, was sometimes makes it difficult absent a tremendous crisis. I would concede that. We need to understand democracy. Small the ambience two and four year elections. Understand democracy is being much more vibrant. Who we elect office and how we hold them accountable. Grassroots organizing. So whatever has been going on in politics, we saw the ground from. On the ground organizing is taking place which gives me hope. Imagine democrac
Been deployed in the area. And more than a dozen people are injured in bombings near kabuls airport. And power shift, National Assembly tomorrow there are fears of violence as government supporters vow to save the legacy of the late hugo chavez. And financial crisis. Well have to sacrifice essential services for the people of puerto rico. Puerto rico defaults on a 1 billion debt payment and lawsuits loom because it paid some creditors at the expense of others. Good evening im antonio mora, this is al jazeeras International News hour and we begin this evening with the diplomatic crisis involving saudi arabia and iran. U. N. Security council has just condemned the attack on the Saudi Embassy in tehran and a number of nations are siding with the saudis. Bahrain, sudan and the United Arab Emirates has either cut ties with iran or have substantially reduced them. There are fears growing over the future of the syrian peace negotiations. The u. N. Special envoy for syria, Staffan De Mistura i
60s are contributing at the contribution limits. Thank you mr. Chairman. Please go ahead. If i could ask a question. The behavioral economics have shown a couple of successes into some of us are concerned about it contains some who rather than providing the much to help people navigate different decisionmaking would provide a fullfledged private citizens. It seems that some operate on the notion that academic and government technocrats are infallible and they tell how they should leave their wives and allocated to the resources. The former oversoul in the Environment Administration along with a harvard the harvard professor who pretend about the behavior of informed Financial Services regulations. One of the proposed schemes is to nationalize on the credit cards to get card issues the government technocrats and use the funds for the Financial Education and other ways to help the private citizens. What do you feel about such a proposal and dvd that the government technocrats needed to e