In the interview you insist that you are an artist first and foremost, every museum institution, especially a large one, must follow this trend in order to speak the same language with society, under a pile of documents , havent you completely lost your love for the craft in passion . These are almost creative torments, you need to learn how to deal with them in order to achieve a certain result, this is not a game. Did the difficult life in art scare you away from choosing a profession . Asking for the tradition of the classics, the question of a masterpiece is an eternal topic, you should not force yourself to work and be in art, should feel this as their life. Yes, im not a serial manufacturer, i always push away. From the task, this is a portrait of my mother by my brush, but it seems that picasso, hello, you are watching the program tell me not to be silent, victoria popova and Tatyana Shcherbina are in the studio, and today we are visiting. General director of the National Art Mu
Campus commemorating the breakthrough and exploring the experiments longterm impact and defense has presented opportunities to engage scientist, are artists, policymakers and the public around a set of issues that grow from that original event 75 years ago. Now, this evenings discussion im particularly delight because it brings social science into the conversation in just the way it should be. Our panelists will be introduced in just a moment. Each is a scholar in International Relations and national security, and theyll offer different viewpoints on military decisions, the role of nuclear arms and the formation of alliances and aids and obstacles to nonproliferation efforts. This events sponsored be by television of social sciences at the university of shack and also sponsored by the center for International Social Science Research at the institute of politic and the chicago project on security and threats. Now im going introduce or moderateow, steve edwards, steve will introduce the
Good evening, everyone. Thank you for coming, and welcome. My name is Amanda Woodward and i am the dean of the division of social sciences here at the university of chicago. Im just delighted to be here with this group of faculty for this event. This evening is continuing a yearlong series of events at the university of chicago commemorating the 75th 75th anniversary of the selfsustaining Nuclear Chain reaction that happened just over there. And over the past five months there have been events across campus commemorating the breakthrough and exploring the experiments longterm impact and defense has presented opportunities to engage scientist, are artists, policymakers and the public around a set of issues that grow from that original event 75 years ago. Now, this evenings discussion im particularly delight because it brings social science into the conversation in just the way it should be. Our panelists will be introduced in just a moment. Each is a scholar in International Relations a
Charter schools are run by forprofit entities. That is a very different environment. In the environment there is so much mistrust so i think any time he gets into charter he brings in a chain and this is the beginning of a different sort of an effort. But from the outside it does not smell right. So much of the issue is localized so would his uniform if we create more space for a public Charter Schools and they are Public Schools with the autonomy they should be held to the same transparency standards. To the greatest extent possible any City Building space for a district to be better and for Charter Schools to be innovative need to create the most level Playing Field possible. And to be transparent as they can be and that is the biggest tragedy. When the Chicago Teacher strike was happening the title of the article is a part of buses dying in chicago. Of wind things like that happens our ongoing ability to maintain tenuously a hold on a Democratic Society admits to a larger engine of
Frustration and people that are struggling and communities that are struggling violence. I dont have a good answer. It takes some dialogue. Do you want to weigh in . I have thought a little bit about that before in one beginning of an idea i came up with is things need to be tackled in preschool because in preschool, preschool is a time where kids have the fewest ideas coming into conceptions about the world. Its the ideal time to try and encourage empathy through the structure of preschool and my hope would be as soon as we go through preschool and become more empathetic individuals in that time of very Rapid Development they are going to go into Elementary School and eventually high school with a much more empathetic background and that will leave them much more in tuned to the issues that you brought up which is i think the first step. There are simply people recognizing their presence in being willing to talk about them. Anybody else want to weigh in before i answer back . It seems