central lancashire. thank you for being with us on the programme, and we say that condemnation from many countries around the world, posing real security risk for the region, how worried should the region and the rest of us really be? 50. worried should the region and the rest of us really be? rest of us really be? so, as you said, rest of us really be? so, as you said. there rest of us really be? so, as you said, there are rest of us really be? so, as you said, there are quite rest of us really be? so, as you said, there are quite many - rest of us really be? so, as you i said, there are quite many worries by the experts around north korea s current situation was to my view is slightly different, though, because kimjeong in slightly different, though, because kim jeong in essentially had a meeting with putin as we well know before the ukrainian russian or and kimjong un managed to before the ukrainian russian or and kim jong un managed to sell lots of weapons to russi
Secondly, i do think we have to understand that at stake here is at one hand the world of anarchy because that is what is unleashed in mariupol and elsewhere, versus some kind of rules, some kind of order and that s why the framing i think the west should be adopting is not democracy versus autocracy but rules versus anarchy. that s a fundamental part of this. thirdly, i think anne-marie is absolutely right to point out while the west is more united as before, the world is equally divided and the votes she referred to at the u.n. should be fundamental. from my point of view, the strategy has to be more about a mariupol free but a world which has rules to govern the way its run. let s get to precisely this issue, why is it when people think about democracy versus autocracy, the problem with that formulation, as david very well put it, is some of the world s largest democracies are at best sitting on the fence? india, indonesia, brazil, even mexico. what do you think is going on from y
I spoke to rob shaw about this, and he is the president of the rockefeller foundation and former head for the u.s. agency for international development. welcome, raj. thanks, fareed. first, let me put this in perspective. is it fair to say the rockefeller foundation is famous for igniting the green revolution around the world, that allowed countries like india to feed itself and in fact become a food exporter. is this on the scale of that kind of effort? this is absolutely on that scale. and this is perhaps a bigger challenge. you know, today in order for us to defeat climate change, we have to approach this problem in a way that included everybody. and nearly 3 billion people on this planet only consume less than 1,000 kilowatt hours per year of energy and electricity. that s 1/12 of what a typical
Absolutely right to point out while the west is more united as before, the world is equally divided and the votes she referred to at the u.n. should be fundamental. from my point of view, the strategy has to be more about a mariupol free but a world which has rules to govern the way its run. let s get to precisely this issue, why is it when people think about democracy versus autocracy, the problem with that formulation, as david very well put it, is some of the world s largest democracies are at best sitting on the fence? india, indonesia, brazil, even mexico. what do you think is going on from your perspective? well, i think if you know when russia invaded ukraine, most of the world was horrified. it was terrible. and there was a great global consensus against it. but now i share the concerns of anne-marie and david that clearly the west, as you know,
Call for your free publisher kit today! the west arms to ukraine have undoubtedly boosted the country s defense but what is the west s long game to secure peace in ukraine and in europe? what should it be? joining me now, david miliband, president and ceo of the international rescue committee, former foreign minister of britain, anne-marie slaughter and kishore mahbubani from the national organization of singapore and longtime former diplomat. ann-marie, what should the west s long-term game be here? the first half of that game has to be simply stop the fighting. we re going to see the complete destruction of eastern and southern ukraine. if you look at what happened in 2014 when they took over part of eastern ukraine and crimea, it can just go forever, the fighting. we have to stop the fighting. second, however, we need a geopolitical configuration that is not russia and china, europep the united states and the rest of the world. if you look at what happened with the human rights