Has in reviewing these referals from the Sunshine Ordinance Task force to refer that to another adjudicatory body completely. It is one thing to have a staff person to review in place of Ethics Commission staff and you know, conform the analysis, based on proceedings before the task force. I think that it is another to send the ultimate decision to another body. It is actually being transcribed. On the screen. Miss herrick, thank you for your time and i have a couple of questions about your response. Does that mean. Are you aware of whether the san jose Ethics Commission has ever handled either on an advisorry basis or otherwise complaint referal from the different jurisdictional agencies . I have staffed the san jose Election Commission from 2008 and we have not ever accepted any such referals. Has the Elections Commission made any referals themselves for matters to be handled by a agency outside of san jose . The Election Commission procedures and i think that our ethics ordinance do
Of whether the San Jose Ethics Commission has ever handled either on an advisorry basis or otherwise complaint referal from the different jurisdictional agencies . I have staffed the san jose Election Commission from 2008 and we have not ever accepted any such referals. Has the Elections Commission made any referals themselves for matters to be handled by a agency outside of san jose . The Election Commission procedures and i think that our ethics ordinance do have some provisions for making referals. But that is generally in the nature of the District Attorney office or their political practice commission. It would be something consistent with the jurisdiction of the sElection Commission but might possibly be. There may be some criminal activity or some additional allegations that related to some violations of political format. Not to another agency like the San Francisco Ethics Commission or the oakland Ethics Commission. Okay. Thank you. Very much. And any other questions for miss h
Procedures that your commission has in reviewing these referals from the Sunshine Ordinance Task force to refer that to another adjudicatory body completely. It is one thing to have a staff person to review in place of Ethics Commission staff and you know, conform the analysis, based on proceedings before the task force. I think that it is another to send the ultimate decision to another body. It is actually being transcribed. On the screen. Miss herrick, thank you for your time and i have a couple of questions about your response. Does that mean. Are you aware of whether the san jose Ethics Commission has ever handled either on an advisorry basis or otherwise complaint referal from the different jurisdictional agencies . I have staffed the san jose Election Commission from 2008 and we have not ever accepted any such referals. Has the Elections Commission made any referals themselves for matters to be handled by a agency outside of san jose . The Election Commission procedures and i th
Thank you. I am so sorry. I am lisa herrick and i was asked to review the referal from the Sunshine Task force, Sunshine Ordinance Task force and i agree with mr. Gibner that i am not sure that there is a Legal Authority under the procedures that your commission has in reviewing these referals from the Sunshine Ordinance Task force to refer that to another adjudicatory body completely. It is one thing to have a staff person to review in place of Ethics Commission staff and you know, conform the analysis, based on proceedings before the task force. I think that it is another to send the ultimate decision to another body. It is actually being transcribed. On the screen. Miss herrick, thank you for your time and i have a couple of questions about your response. Does that mean. Are you aware of whether the san jose Ethics Commission has ever handled either on an advisorry basis or otherwise complaint referal from the different jurisdictional agencies . I have staffed the san jose Election
Found in violation of the ordinance, to date this commission has refused to comply and refused to hear the referal from sotf from ethics, of course what you produced is 134page response trying to justify it which is a load of crap. Why are you so afraid of having comments from the public be presented accurately in the official records of your meetings. Why do you insist on placing the 150 word summaries in an alternative location, substituting in their proper place, in the minutes, your sensored version of those comments . And why have the members of the Ethics Commission advocated their responsibility to the director john saint croy in matters that go to the very heart of the open and honest operation. It is a real shame that a citizen of this city has to actually fight with boards and commissions who have taken an oath to support and defend the constitution of the United States and that of the state of california, who in some cases even have a chance to speak. And this is protected p