and you might get ahead. thank you for joining us.. capitol hill custodians waste no time erasing any memory of george santos. that is tonight on news line. good evening, today, an era has come to an end. the locks have been changed and his name has been removed from the halls of congress. and george santos goes back to wherever he came from. more on his exit and his lies in a few minutes. but first, the constitution versus donald trump. two separate legal loss essay that the former president does not have immunity. breaking tonight, a federal judge tossed a motion to make election subversion charges against donald trump disappear. the judge ruling with precision quote the court can not conclude that the constitution cloaks former president s with salute immunity for any federal crimes that they committed while in office. also today, a ruling on the former president and the january 6th violence that he unleashed. it is a decision that may set off a chain reaction for ou
white house refuses to produce? it has taken us eight months to get a lower court ruling that dawn mcgahn has no absolute right to defy congress. eight months. for one court decision. if it takes us another eight months to get a second court or maybe a supreme court decision, people need to understand that is not the end of the process. it comes back to us and we ask questions because he no longer has salute immunity, and then he claims something else that answers our privileged and we have to go back to court for another 8 or 16 months. the argument why don t you just wait amounts to this. why don t you just let him cheat in one more election? why not let him cheat just one more time? why not let him have foreign help just one more time? that is what that argument
he s more likely to be the chris christie of the race where he can use his money to take someone else the way governor christy took out senator rubio in the debate. just to finish up, do you think he can beat president trump? i think he can give him a run for his money, literally. [laughter] the big question whether the left would vote for mike bloomberg or state home and default the election. paul: i think they want to beat trump enough they will come out, federal judge rules against president trump s claim of salute immunity for white house advisers, what it could mean as the democratic impeachment inquiry moves ahead
he s more likely to be the chris christie of the race where he can use his money to take someone else the way governor christy took out senator rubio in the debate. just to finish up, do you think he can beat president trump? i think he can give him a run for his money, literally. [laughter] the big question whether the left would vote for mike bloomberg or state home and default the election. paul: i think they want to beat trump enough they will come out, federal judge rules against president trump s claim of salute immunity for white house advisers, what it could mean as the democratic impeachment inquiry moves ahead.
link to the president in all of this. how can mick mulvaney straight up ignore a subpoena? it s an unfortunate circumstance powers of congress have atrophied over the last 40 or 50 years, frankly, and so this is the president in effect asserting an a be salute immunity from scrutiny very remnant why we had a resolution. getting away from kings asserting an absolute prerogative. it s wrong for the president to do so but limited ways to compel people to abide by the subpoena authority especially when the house democratic caucus cannot enlist the senate republicans in enforcing congressional more breaking news on the prerogatives through other items impeachment inquiry. like budgets or appointment john bolton, forrer national authorize. the obvious question. why not let your people testify security adviser says he has if you re in the white house? many additional meetings house if there s nothing to hide? lawmakers still don t know about.