turn out but if you are going to talk a big game about loyalty, stand up for the people who have been loyal to you and follow through. this is going to require i think both if it is going to go anywhere it is going to require both gentlemen to do things they have not done before. it is going to require both gentlemen to set some things aside i think. for trump it is clearly going to have to be he s going to have to overlook the loyalty issue in this case because he believes country has to come first. and for governor romney country has to come first over all the i got to leave there it. next one of the biggest draws in new york. it always used to get a lot of tourists. but it is a whole new game now. the secret service keep trump save in his own home. senator sessions overseeing the justice department should send chills down the backs of anyone with good faith in this country.
well, for me, again, i understand what you are saying about this notion of personal freedom. especially when it comes to less regulation on business. but, i think if you are a kid, i say you are a young person growing up california invest far nor in educational system. bill: doesn t get results though. 37 out of 50. i m talking about higher education, bill. bill: they don t even get there, juan. they are not getting to higher education, all right? they are 37 out of auto in high school dropout rate. come on. here is my point to you. you look at things like food stamps, number one, texas in terms of, you know, health insurance, who has health insurance? texas doesn t have health insurance. the kids, number one in the country lack of health insurance. you look at wages. i like to get paid. well, guess what, wages since 2007 stagnant in texas. bill: juan, there is only a $4,000 difference in average per capita wage and have you
susan rice is a black woman. there have been a lot of articles on this but the worst by far, the sleaziest by far is that editorial you refer to in the the washington post. let me read you part of what it says. starting with the sentence you just read. because this is really off the charts. as you read: could it be as members of the congressional black caucus are charging that the signators of letter are targeting misrice because she is an african-american woman? then it goes on to say: the signators deny that and we can t know their hearts. what we do know is that more than 80 oof the signatories are white males and nearly half are from states of the former confederacy. so, what they are saying, after the mandatory we don t know what s in their hearts is that but we do know that they are white, and that they are men, and that some of them come from a part of the country that 150 years ago had
if you have assets, house, gold, car, whatever, those governments are going to take some of that. uber liberals in america want to do the same thing. you can replace completely the income tax and the estate and gift taxes with a wealth tax of 1.5%. i think it should be graduated and progressive because to meet most important issue is to deal with the wealth nawbility inequality in this country which is much more severe than the income inequality in the country. bill: isn t that interesting. wealth inequality. where have we heard that before? carl marks? mao, fidel castro? if the u.s. were to impose a so-called wealth tax, that would be the seizure of private property. thus unconstitutional. on paper we can t do it. but we are living in a very strange time and socialism is close. state of vermont has a socialist senator bernie sanders. he would take everything he could from the wealthy. if congress passes a law that seizes private property from
this liberal philosophy that barack obama embraces by the way works? well, because i think you see more children getting the kind of education, the healthcare they need to grow taxpayers. bill: facts don t show that, juan. mary katharine, go ahead. folks like juan who paint texas jobs as horrible need to figure out whether obama gets wants to take credit for the jobs that texas has largely been creating during his tenure or they want to slam them as ineffect actual. look, in the end, for folks who are most at risk, what do the left most care about, income inequality. higher in california than it is in texas right now. when you talk about the kind of jobs that folks get or welfare, for instance, 1/3 of america s welfare recipients in california even though it makes up 1/8th of the country s population. these are not good stats for the people who are least among us who we are caring about who as liberals we want to serve it doesn t work for them. bill: i think this is why.