you very much for coming. it is always somewhat artificial, two people that know each other well. to do an interview in public like this. why should i ask a question i can ask her over the breakfast table? on the other hand, one doesn t really normally discuss the japanese naval strategy in over 1941 the breakfast table. so it s as good as any opportunity as any to discuss this a little bit further. and one of the things that i find most interesting about the book, and revealing and possibly for many readers in this country also, is that it tackles a myth about pearl harbor. and one of the myths is, which was, of course, very much encouraged in the immediate postwar period, not only the japanese themselves but also by the american administration, is that japan had been hijacked by by the militarists, by the military, and the civilians really were not to blame for what happened. it was a kind of militarist cue, coup, and the middle the japanese people and the emperor himse
carolinas, and saying, as a conservative republican this has to happen have to have a fair fight. our argument is that our job is to say, look, we can have honest differences on all sorts of fundamental issues but we ought to have a politics that works in this country and isn t just about big money, and during the shutdown fight issue thought republicans, members of congress talking about bailouts for corporations and complaining about this maybe there was some cynicism there. i m not sure. i will tell you i think there s an immense amount of space and we have not begun to occupy that space. we have not begun to make those demands for the structural changes. it s time to do that. it s time to say that a conservative republican and a liberal democrat, ought to be able to agree that everyone should be able to vote, that our elections should have meaning, and that the vote ought to matter more than the dollar. i m delighted, if that s the framework of the debate, i ll debate a
divorce. american style. if you are married, the odds of getting divorced are about 50/50. if you are not married the odds of avoiding divorce are much better. if you heed the advice of this 600-dollar divorce lawyer. from love to marriage to who gets control of the baby carriage, our guest has practical adve for every stage of the contemporary relationship. what happens next when you are no longer willing to wait until death do us part. we ask beverly hills divorce attorney mark bereden congratulations on this book what were you thinking? what does that mean? it is the question that all of your friends will ask to you after you have gone through a separation or divorce. what were you thinking? why did you marry whoever? what is the principle reason why people get divorced. they get mried. itho marriage there would be no divorce. without marriage there would be no divorce whatsoever. does that argue against marriage. it argues against immature marriage. i
with scott pelley. pelley: good evening. late today, federal investigators said there was nothing wrong with the brakes on that metro north commuter train that derailed in new york city sunday morning killing four passengers and injuring dozens of others. they said that the brakes had been tested before and during the train s run. yet to be answered is why the train was going nearly three times the speed limit. it s coming down to the actions of the engineer and jeff pegues, our transportation correspondent has the latest. jeff? reporter: scott, in addition to that information about the brakes, the n.t.s.b. revealed late today that there was no sign that any of the crew members including the engineer had used alcohol. this is n.t.s.b. board member earle wainer earlier today. reporter: increasingly, the focus of the investigation appears to be human error. sources say that william rockefeller, jr., the engineer, told first responders on sunday that before the train wen
which is at the heart of their impeachment inquiry. and breaking news, three house committees, including the intelligence committee which will be taking the lead, announced inthat secretary of state mike pompeo had been subpoenaed for documents. and these committees tell pompeo that your failure or refusal to comply shall constitute evidence of obstruction of the house s impeachment inquiry. the committee also announced that they scheduled depositions for five state department officials over the next two weeks. and nearly all of those witnesses were mentioned by name in the whistleblower complaint that was made public yesterday. as we told you, that whistleblower complaint is your guide to a witness list. and in the letter to pompeo, democrats note that giuliani s recent public statements have raised troubling statements about the state s department s involvement. and yes, seemingly at the intersection of every avenue of this scan dam is the president s personal attorney and