Important question, the cdc tracks flu every year all i am so pleased to moderate this important session. We are a nonprofit, nonpartisan Public Health policy research and Advocacy Organization based in washington, d. C. The covid19 pandemic is an immense challenge. Envision a nation that values the health and wellbeing of all. Since the spring of this year, we have held a series of webinars focused on the impact protecting older adults from the arm of social isolation. How the pandemic is concentrated in many gaps. We also cohosted a congressional briefing on advancing Racial Equity. It should go without saying that this is an unprecedented pandemic. The likes of which has not been seen in this country. Seenve certainly disparities in past Public Health emergencies. The pandemic has greatly exposed trust for Americas Health has been advocating. Calling for data disaggregation. We are also focusing on other issues. Calling for investment in Public Health infrastructure. This includes i
Regulate the time, place and manner of signage but not necessarily the content. So i have a little bit of concern about condition number two and the citys ability to enforce it in the future. Okay. Will the motion maker want to amend that . Sure. Why dont i take out condition two and then add in the look back. I second it. It was okay. Commissioner fung. I think the project sponsor heard the suggestion and is probably aware of what they need to do with respect to condition number two. Commissioners if theres nothing further there is a motion that has been seconded to approve this meater with matter with conditions. Eliminateing number two on that motion commissioner fung . Aye. Johnson. Koppel. Aye. Melgar. Aye. So moved that motion passes unanimously four to zero. cheering. . We still have business so if you could dial it down i would appreciate it, and quietly exit. I will place this under your discretionary review calendar. 1299 sanchez street. If those persons leaving the chambers
Going to happen but have a good discussion and none is looking at this thing that the commissioners is over ruled one way or another but our proposal staff is willing to have the discussion. Because and guess where i come from if we think theres a need for a filing of form 7 hundred i dont know why there should be a tier one and two because the purpose of the 7 hundred is to pubically disclosure information which the public has a right to know to see whether the specific employee has a conflict and from the determination is made that his or her didnt have the dignities making power then i dont think you should be filing a form 7 hundred thats a burden you put on them that shouldnt be there if you say youve got to file the form 7 hundred that person is a dignities maker therefore why treat them differently than any other form 7 hundred and thats what flies it proposal to get a easily assessable. With you i share the view that a lot of people are required to file the form 7 hundred that
Requirement be added to the city laws and that expenditure lobbyists be required to register with our commission when they engage in expenditure lobbying one of the big changes that i made from my original writing that was put before this group i made at the suggestion of commissioner hur who said that in his opinion there should be a provision on for the board of supervisors to change it if they feel appropriate there was a fair amount of opposition but narmdz to the board of supervisors can change it in the future so if something is not located into stone they have to change it so it selfchange the spirit and in accordance with the rules relating to the commission and if they change it they will not chapping it in a way to lesson the reporting you want the reporting in regards to the question its the expenditure lobbyist what is that well expenditure lobbyists is someone who is going to spend all sorts of money to go forward and effect a city proposal or a city piece of legislation o
At this thing that the commissioners is over ruled one way or another but our proposal staff is willing to have the discussion. Because and guess where i come from if we think theres a need for a filing of form 7 hundred i dont know why there should be a tier one and two because the purpose of the 7 hundred is to pubically disclosure information which the public has a right to know to see whether the specific employee has a conflict and from the determination is made that his or her didnt have the dignities making power then i dont think you should be filing a form 7 hundred thats a burden you put on them that shouldnt be there if you say youve got to file the form 7 hundred that person is a dignities maker therefore why treat them differently than any other form 7 hundred and thats what flies it proposal to get a easily assessable. With you i share the view that a lot of people are required to file the form 7 hundred that shouldnt be they have a right not to disclose that information