Page 3 - Removal Department News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Stay updated with breaking news from Removal department. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.

Top News In Removal Department Today - Breaking & Trending Today

SFGTV Government Access Programming January 30, 2018

Process, we had a phase one and phase two and did repeated soil testing and essentially across the site, there are lead levels that are considered california hazards waste. Six of those locations were considered federal Hazardous Waste and needed to be transported off site. The site mitigation plan basically im sorry. Let me go back. What weve got documented in our brief is that it had been our plan to retain the five trees. We actually included the original planting plan that showed all five of those trees. So, as a result of the Due Diligence process that we went through and determined that we had a significant lead soil issue, we worked on trying to come up with a plan essentially for how to mitigate it. We had to submit a plan to the department of Public Health and there was a lot of work done to try to figure out exa ....

San Francisco , United States , Brian Bates , Matthew Steen , Steve Williams , Michael Palmer , Charles Calhoun , Zhou Xin , Lisa Grady , Matthew Stein , Phase One , Phase Two , Soil Testing , Hazardous Waste , Due Diligence , Plan Department , Department Public , Department Public Health , Public Health , Health Lot , Public Housing , Management Plan , Retention Program , Additional Information , Information Trees , Poor Condition ,

SFGTV BOS Full Board Of Supervisors 71916 July 20, 2016

That does not account for others that come into the area that work here, who have a 49 square mile city. So these people do the odds. There are some bad apples everywhere. If we have them have this background check, we can eliminate some of the bad apples, it will be good for both industries, im urging an aye vote here. Supervisors, we are your City Industry and were being thrown under the muni vote. If they start putting taxicabs out of business when theyre really close, they can do whatever they want because they have no 1 regulating, thank you for your time. Thank you. Next speaker please. Good evening, thank you for allowing us to speak, my name is marcel. I have been driving a taxi full time in this city for 28 years. I came here to urge this board to support supervisor peskins resolution urging the cpuc, to adopt fingerprinting, for all drivers, its a noncontroversial safety measure for drivers. It is the most reliable way to ....

United States , North Carolina , San Francisco Bay , North Beach , City Of , United Kingdom , San Francisco , Paul Henson , Linda Richardson , Loma Prieta , Kathy Davis , Olsen Lee , Santa Barbara , George Davis Kathy , Eric Brown , Shane Walker , Bayview George , Millie Nixon , Malia Cohen , William Walker , Kimberly Carter , Yee Kim , Kevin Wilcox , Barbara Smith , Bernie Sanders , Al Williams ,

SFGTV BOS Full Board Of Supervisors 71916 July 24, 2016

Officers, of citizens, complaints, is that correct . And real estate. Somebody said real estate. Okay. No. The original proposal, if i may madame president , had both the office of labor standards and enforcement nocc under the public advocate, the amendment made in committee was actually with respect to both offices not have them been under public advocate, but to have the public advocate appoint the heads so the officers, were not moved under public advocate, actually, the public advocate had the ability to appoint. So that was different. But you didnt pull them out, you just changed it . I dont understand the question. For some reason, i was under the impression for example, office of citizens, complaints, was removed from public advocate in committee, and now placed back in but in a different form. What happened in committee is the way the olsc and the occ were left after i amended. After the committee made the other amendments, is those 2 offices were not under public advocate, th ....

United States , North Beach , San Francisco , Woodrow Wilson , Tang Weiner , Ann Hess , Lee Hepner , Kathleen Willy , Alex Jones , Jesus Christ , Office Labor , City County , Way People , City Hall , Commission Members , Office May , Union Rights , Civil Service , Mayors Office , Office Board , Department Police , Pleasure Police , Police Commission , Commission Shall , Item Number , Amendment Campaign ,

SFGTV BOS Full Board Of Supervisors 71916 July 25, 2016

Complaints, is that correct . And real estate. Somebody said real estate. Okay. No. The original proposal, if i may madame president , had both the office of labor standards and enforcement nocc under the public advocate, the amendment made in committee was actually with respect to both offices not have them been under public advocate, but to have the public advocate appoint the heads so the officers, were not moved under public advocate, actually, the public advocate had the ability to appoint. So that was different. But you didnt pull them out, you just changed it . I dont understand the question. For some reason, i was under the impression for example, office of citizens, complaints, was removed from public advocate in committee, and now placed back in but in a different form. What happened in committee is the way the olsc and the occ were left after i amended. After the committee made the other amendments, is those 2 offices were not under public advocate, they remained where they ....

United States , North Beach , San Francisco , Woodrow Wilson , Tang Weiner , Ann Hess , Lee Hepner , Kathleen Willy , Alex Jones , Jesus Christ , Office Labor , City County , Way People , City Hall , Commission Members , Office May , Union Rights , Civil Service , Mayors Office , Office Board , Department Police , Pleasure Police , Police Commission , Commission Shall , Item Number , Amendment Campaign ,

SFGTV BOS Full Board Of Supervisors 71916 July 22, 2016

Complaints, is that correct . And real estate. Somebody said real estate. Okay. No. The original proposal, if i may madame president , had both the office of labor standards and enforcement nocc under the public advocate, the amendment made in committee was actually with respect to both offices not have them been under public advocate, but to have the public advocate appoint the heads so the officers, were not moved under public advocate, actually, the public advocate had the ability to appoint. So that was different. But you didnt pull them out, u just changed it . I dont understand the question. For some reason, i was under the impression for example, office of citizens, complaints, was removed from public advocate in committee, and now placed back in but in a different form. What happened in committee is the way the olsc and the occ were left after i amended. After the committee made the other amendments, is those 2 offices were not under public advocate, they remained where they we ....

United States , North Beach , San Francisco , Woodrow Wilson , Tang Weiner , Ann Hess , Lee Hepner , Kathleen Willy , Alex Jones , Jesus Christ , Office Labor , City County , Way People , City Hall , Commission Members , Office May , Union Rights , Civil Service , Mayors Office , Office Board , Department Police , Pleasure Police , Police Commission , Commission Shall , Item Number , Amendment Campaign ,