but i m still grateful that something will be released. i m hoping truly that attorneyt general garland saw that the earlier position was wrong y and he went to the department o be asparents try t transparent as possible. i mean, afte ar all, this affidavit doesn t likely a lot o contain a lot of good sectionsfd for donald trump affidavit are like that. this is these are one sided a case forat make searches and seizures. so it s not like i m worried that they are only redacting the stuff that s good for donald trump. hopin but i m hoping that they see this as a moment to break fromkm tradition, to have greater transparency. u and we will see tomorrow. the rx so the reflex from the dojld pra would probably be to take a page full of words and make it nothing. but you re saying potentially t there s an incentive frombecaus the doj because of the blowbacek to, you know, redacting names
0 right now. this season you need america s weather team precise personal power box weather is hurricane hq tony andrew , status ofa thought criminal. you have an inalienable right to decidt ane for yourself and u can on fox nation right now, the full interview, of course, will be back as we always are, eight p.m. weeknights here. sean hannity. that s not sean hannity. headset great chain accent isn t he snuck up on you?, i snuck up on your brother. i love that little ambush. little ambush at nine pm. tucker rachels, thanks a lot. all right. welcome to this specialof edition of hannity . as tucker said hannity as tuce hegseth in tonight for sure and we begin with breaking news from south florida today. judge bruce rheinhardt ordered the doj to unseal a redactederso version of that affidavit usede to justify the mar a lago raid. federal officials now have tomol noon tomorrow to make this affidavit public. here now with the very latest t fox news contributor jonathanere turley. jonath
redactions, is that correct? okay, with those redactions. harris: we have been watching johnny depp in cross examination and, you know, there are a lot of administrative points they re dealing with right now. redacting names and email addresses from documents and we ll pull back for now. brian claypool defense attorney is with me now. i had a question for you. the audience knows i m not a
investigation and bob mueller but it is being conflated. reasonably so. jesse: i think the conflation comes in terms of one of the things i think the reporting says we do know is that this dossier that was paid for by hillary and was fake was used as the justification is by the trump campaign. that seems like the hardest bit of evidence we have. as far as anything else, it looks like comey has been implicated in some capacity. rosenstein has been implicated. every those names bandied about. now they want to redact those names. i don t see what redacting names will do. they are saying they have changed the memo. that s a lie. i think it was a grammatical change. the other change was something the democrats wanted. the smoke screen, the democrats like to say, it s a smoke screen for the russia investigation. the democrats are now deploying a smoke screen for the abuse of power because right now it does look like, people were debating this for many years, worried
this broader idea that builds of its own momentum and sets in. we saw it in that clip of tom cotton s town hall where voters are worked up about this. it s not that people are angry about the taxes on their own, it s the larger narrative of the president is not being level with you. a president hiding. his credibility numbers were in the basement when he was running. again, you could say it was written off to cillizza s point. he was running against an opponent who also for a lot of americans had honesty issues. but chris, this is the part that really confound me, the visitor logs to the white house. the white house is the people s house. frankly i didn t understand the obama policy of redacting names, too. what are they keeping from the public? what s so classified in the visitor logs? alisyn, remember that the obama policy was much more transparent than all the policies before it where the white house visitor logs weren t made public. the problem i have with sean